Fail
New Head-Fier
- Joined
- Sep 23, 2012
- Posts
- 19
- Likes
- 12
I've never posted here before, much less leaving a review. I'm a newish member, but I've been lurking head-fi since 2007. With that said, I was compelled to post because before getting my own pair of the Denon AH-D600, I was a little concerned they would be another set of cans that I ended up using a return policy for. The only reason I took the plunge was because I got such an awesome deal, and due to how much I love my AH-D2000.
Well, I must say that I'm really liking these headphones. I like them more than my D2000 (although these a slightly more comfortable, but also require constant adjustment) in almost every way. I'm not going to throw around a lot of technical jargon, because quite frankly, all of that is subjective anyways, but I can say that these are definitely bass heavy. However, I actually appreciate that about them. I've always felt that if headphones could produce decent sound in the mid and high range but lacked a lot of bass, there wasn't much you could do with an EQ to really bring that bass back. With headphones like these with plenty of power at all ranges you can EQ out or in the stuff you personally find most pleasing. For me, I appreciate good bass. I wouldn't say I'm a bass head, but I do appreciate some punch, and that is something that these cans are not lacking in. Also, they are incredibly easy to drive to the point that my Nexus 4 has no issue producing great sound using the Google Play Music app.
With all of that said, why is it that these headphones seem to get such a bad reputation on these boards? Especially when people then follow their statements by touting how much better the D2000/D5000 were by comparison? I have the D2000, and I don't see them as superior. Obviously sound preference is just that, and these sound great.
For reference, I have the Denon AH-D2000, Denon AH-D600, Sony MDR-XB500, Sony MDR-XB600 (the XB500 sounds way better and is more comfortable), Ultimate Ears Triple.Fi 10, and previously owned the Sennheiser HD-595.
Well, I must say that I'm really liking these headphones. I like them more than my D2000 (although these a slightly more comfortable, but also require constant adjustment) in almost every way. I'm not going to throw around a lot of technical jargon, because quite frankly, all of that is subjective anyways, but I can say that these are definitely bass heavy. However, I actually appreciate that about them. I've always felt that if headphones could produce decent sound in the mid and high range but lacked a lot of bass, there wasn't much you could do with an EQ to really bring that bass back. With headphones like these with plenty of power at all ranges you can EQ out or in the stuff you personally find most pleasing. For me, I appreciate good bass. I wouldn't say I'm a bass head, but I do appreciate some punch, and that is something that these cans are not lacking in. Also, they are incredibly easy to drive to the point that my Nexus 4 has no issue producing great sound using the Google Play Music app.
With all of that said, why is it that these headphones seem to get such a bad reputation on these boards? Especially when people then follow their statements by touting how much better the D2000/D5000 were by comparison? I have the D2000, and I don't see them as superior. Obviously sound preference is just that, and these sound great.
For reference, I have the Denon AH-D2000, Denon AH-D600, Sony MDR-XB500, Sony MDR-XB600 (the XB500 sounds way better and is more comfortable), Ultimate Ears Triple.Fi 10, and previously owned the Sennheiser HD-595.