I’m not quite sure what the point of announcing that one refuses to have further debate with a poster to another poster..then several more chime in to do the same.
Seems passive aggressive.
Seems passive aggressive.
Last edited:
I’m not quite sure what the point of announcing that one refuses to have further debate with a poster to another poster..then several more chime in to do the same.
Seems passive aggressive.
lmao. I'm sorry this is bullsht. Posting "measurements" without any analysis of what the eff you're actually looking at and if it's actually audible is a waste of time. You're wasting our time, you're wasting your own time. Just stop doing it.I'm just chilling and putting some thoughts that are triggering to the "ministry of audio science" like providing objective measurements that can't be seen on the holy AP555B unless it's actually so bad that it makes squiggly lines on the wave due to horrible noise spectrum
Bad noise spectrum:
![]()
Good noise spectrum:
![]()
Audible? Absolutely to some people, but not to everyone of course because "all sources sound the same" absolute statements from the ministry of audio science
lmao. I'm sorry this is bullsht. Posting "measurements" without any analysis of what the eff you're actually looking at and if it's actually audible is a waste of time. You're wasting our time, you're wasting your own time. Just stop doing it.
I'm just chilling and putting some thoughts
Straw man. No one ever said that all sources sound the same.Audible? Absolutely to some people, but not to everyone of course because "all sources sound the same" absolute statements from the ministry of audio science
This was essentially a blind test that I inadvertently took, and it backed up my sighted testing, that isolation matters on my setup. So back to battery power and optical to isolate… no more issues.
The SQ on my setup was just a bit off. The music was brighter and too hard sounding.
What else should we talk about in a thread that’s been crapped up with boloney?I’m not quite sure what the point of announcing that one refuses to have further debate with a poster to another poster..then several more chime in to do the same.
"Oh Look! There is a graph online showing a measurable change in picovolt on the electric grid on the other side of town, where they turned on the MC Flurry machine. I hear that, but only on the good sound system."
That's your level lately.
What you’re actually doing is trying to build a framework of subjectivity around objective measurements that have little or nothing to do with actual acoustic performance. It’s like you prefer the notion of objectivity because of its aesthetics but you aren’t willing to give up the feel good vibes of subjectivity.I'm aware of that and that's the reality that I perceive from my system and to @eq1849 and others who performed those tests on behalf of us subjectivists. We rely on multiple views of objective measurements using multiple instruments and not just on the analog output of a DAC from an AP555B where other parameters cannot be measured to see where we perceive a potential change in sound can be loosely attributed to objectively
To be fair, @theveterans is far from the only one doing that.What you’re actually doing is trying to build a framework of subjectivity around objective measurements that have little or nothing to do with actual acoustic performance. It’s like you prefer the notion of objectivity because of its aesthetics but you aren’t willing to give up the feel good vibes of subjectivity.
Moreover, many subjectivists are also very happy to attribute perceived effects to something they would like to be the cause, without applying the scientific rigour required to prove that to be plausible, or even scientifically explained
I have no doubt there is no scientific rigor at a cable company. Empirical? Nah. If you think aerospace companies don't adhere to scientific rigor then you're completely delusional.You should try working on a manufacturing company that makes these audio product components or even aerospace industry. You'll soon find out there's hardly any scientific rigour existing there but rather everything is empirical and statistically driven