cravenz
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2009
- Posts
- 1,782
- Likes
- 58
In a nutshell, I still believe that Spain are not using him properly and are not putting their faith in him. One may say that they have played him, but look at the tactics employed when playing him. e.g. before Llorente came on for him, he had to play out wide or even when he was in the centre, many times the ball was not passed to him for a quick break. But when Llorente came on, it's route 1 to him. That's what, for the lack of a better word, has disgusted me and led me to switch off the tv after his substitution for Fabregas. (yes, biased I know but it is a tad frustrating)
Prior to these two games, Torres acted as foil for Villa. In the first match (against the Swiss), they had no penetration whatsoever with Villa as the main and only striker. Did they score? Nope. The moment Torres came on, they created chances. The next two qualifying matches, albeit in one Torres missed a bunch of easy chances, Torres acted as foil for Villa.
At the end of the day, I still agree that Torres has been disappointing, but like I said above, they just don't look like they want to use Torres and the only player who has acknowledged Torres' presence in the team is Villa.
Prior to these two games, Torres acted as foil for Villa. In the first match (against the Swiss), they had no penetration whatsoever with Villa as the main and only striker. Did they score? Nope. The moment Torres came on, they created chances. The next two qualifying matches, albeit in one Torres missed a bunch of easy chances, Torres acted as foil for Villa.
At the end of the day, I still agree that Torres has been disappointing, but like I said above, they just don't look like they want to use Torres and the only player who has acknowledged Torres' presence in the team is Villa.