Zodduska
1000+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2007
- Posts
- 1,368
- Likes
- 14
Quote:
Ety triple compared to Shure's..
the Shure has a longer "stem" section which keeps most of the IEM's tube from entering the flange section unless you mod them, so this tends to have the IEM sticking a lot further out of my ear which kind of feels loose and prone to get bends in parts of the triple flange.
With the Ety it is completely missing this extra stem part and my E4 tube fits almost all the way to the end of the smallest flange. I back them out a bit because full insertion causes the flange to expand slightly which puts too much pressure on the smallest part of my ear canal.. the result is a more stiff laterally inflexible triple flange that can be easily inserted deep into the ear, E4 almost completely disappear. Other than that the Ety seem slightly higher quality overall.
Originally Posted by GravY /img/forum/go_quote.gif are the ety's triples better than what came with my E500? |
Ety triple compared to Shure's..
the Shure has a longer "stem" section which keeps most of the IEM's tube from entering the flange section unless you mod them, so this tends to have the IEM sticking a lot further out of my ear which kind of feels loose and prone to get bends in parts of the triple flange.
With the Ety it is completely missing this extra stem part and my E4 tube fits almost all the way to the end of the smallest flange. I back them out a bit because full insertion causes the flange to expand slightly which puts too much pressure on the smallest part of my ear canal.. the result is a more stiff laterally inflexible triple flange that can be easily inserted deep into the ear, E4 almost completely disappear. Other than that the Ety seem slightly higher quality overall.