Acix
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Jul 7, 2008
- Posts
- 6,486
- Likes
- 78
The current ones...
1. K-702.
2. K-271MKll.
3. Stax 4070.
1. K-702.
2. K-271MKll.
3. Stax 4070.
Originally Posted by Geek /img/forum/go_quote.gif It all depends. The fidelity of unaccompanied music is more often than not ruined by some doofus in the studio, so you're better off just using a pair of HD650s most of the time that mask recording flaws and stupid noisy cuts. If you don't mind living with recording mistakes, the HD800 are better headphones and my personal choice for reference; anything brighter is NOT natural - I've spent more than 20 hours over the last two weeks in rehearsals as an orchestral musician, anything brighter than HD800 is brighter than BEING IN THE ACTUAL ORCHESTRA, anything with more bass than HD800 HAS MORE BASS THAN SITTING NEXT TO THE BASS SECTION IN THE ORCHESTRA!!! - Add to this that most recordings are equalized a bit or sound too bright from mic placement and you pretty much have to stick with "laid-back" (I'd call them "realistic" but then again some people spend more time than me playing in Orchestra so my opinion is relative) Sennheisers to get the right sound. |
Originally Posted by pp312 /img/forum/go_quote.gif I've just posted something similar to this in another thread---namely, that most popular phones are too bright and the Senn 650 is realistically balanced for live instruments heard from a reasonable distance. I've no doubt the HD800 is accurate for the balance as heard in the orchestra pit; I feel the 650 is the most accurate as heard from, say, 15 rows back. |
Originally Posted by tim3320070 /img/forum/go_quote.gif I feel the HD580/600 sound very real with acoustic guitar FWIW. |
Originally Posted by Geek /img/forum/go_quote.gif It all depends. The fidelity of unaccompanied music is more often than not ruined by some doofus in the studio, so you're better off just using a pair of HD650s most of the time that mask recording flaws and stupid noisy cuts. If you don't mind living with recording mistakes, the HD800 are better headphones and my personal choice for reference; anything brighter is NOT natural - I've spent more than 20 hours over the last two weeks in rehearsals as an orchestral musician, anything brighter than HD800 is brighter than BEING IN THE ACTUAL ORCHESTRA, anything with more bass than HD800 HAS MORE BASS THAN SITTING NEXT TO THE BASS SECTION IN THE ORCHESTRA!!! - Add to this that most recordings are equalized a bit or sound too bright from mic placement and you pretty much have to stick with "laid-back" (I'd call them "realistic" but then again some people spend more time than me playing in Orchestra so my opinion is relative) Sennheisers to get the right sound. |
Originally Posted by nickchen /img/forum/go_quote.gif The peakish W5000????? Well, all in the eye of the beholder, if we wait long enough, even the badabooom Proline 900 will get mentioned here ![]() |
Originally Posted by IPodPJ /img/forum/go_quote.gif 1st) HD800 2nd) K702 3rd) DT911 |
Originally Posted by bhanja_trinanjan /img/forum/go_quote.gif LOL… so, other than the DT48 and STAX 4070, there isn’t much of a consensus! An interesting point made in one of the posts was that the distance from the actual orchestra could alter the tonal balance… a HD650 could be accurate 15 rows back and a HD800 could be accurate up front. Also, some cans, especially the K702 continue to invite polarizing opinions on whether they are tonally accurate. Shall watch this thread with eagerness in the days ahead! |