gorman
1000+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Jan 22, 2004
- Posts
- 1,174
- Likes
- 71
Quote:
??? What are these fast functions you are raving about? I've used my friend's iPod and it didn't seem significantly faster than my Karma. Actually, for several functions it was slower. Then again, you say iPod is smaller than Karma... it is not. It is thinner in a larger form factor. You like rectangular, I like square (must be the MiniDisc heritage or something), but iPod is not smaller, just thinner.
Then again... EQ is unimportant, gapless is unimportant. How can we discuss?
Originally Posted by CamelBackCinema Most people buy the ipod and are satisfied by it because size, style, simplicity. You can say whatever you want, you're just being stupid (not directed at you Ilikemusic) if you think that people are buying these products just because its the only one they know or because it "looks" cool. It is a quality product and that's PERIOD! All those other players are quality products too and to say that you wouldn't want all those fast functions that the ipod gives would be a lie. |
??? What are these fast functions you are raving about? I've used my friend's iPod and it didn't seem significantly faster than my Karma. Actually, for several functions it was slower. Then again, you say iPod is smaller than Karma... it is not. It is thinner in a larger form factor. You like rectangular, I like square (must be the MiniDisc heritage or something), but iPod is not smaller, just thinner.
Then again... EQ is unimportant, gapless is unimportant. How can we discuss?