what linux distro are you running?
- Thread starter jim
- Start date
vwap
Padawan.
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2002
- Messages
- 2,919
- Reaction score
- 10
I think I lied in my voting
Oh well. I voted for Slack and Debian.. but I think it's Redhat and Slack.. I have RedHat running KDE here at work...
and I've got a slack box I haven't turned on in a while at home.

and I've got a slack box I haven't turned on in a while at home.
grinch
Cognac....icky.Scotch....icky.Vodka....
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2002
- Messages
- 3,077
- Reaction score
- 11
i was always a debian man, but the latest versions have been bothering me a bit so i've been thinking of trying slack.. hmm.
donovansmith
Headphoneus Supremus
I voted for other since I like BSD much more than any Linux distribution. I have OpenBSD running on one box at the moment, and NetBSD installed on the second hard drive of my primary Windows 2000 box. FreeBSD is also quite nice, and faster than either NetBSD or OpenBSD.
But if I have to choose Linux I'd pick Gentoo and Slackware. Slackware for stability and BSD init system, and Gentoo for super-easy package management.
As far as window managers, WindowMaker is my favorite by far.
But if I have to choose Linux I'd pick Gentoo and Slackware. Slackware for stability and BSD init system, and Gentoo for super-easy package management.
As far as window managers, WindowMaker is my favorite by far.
kerelybonto
doo-di-doo-di-dum doo-di-dum doo-di-doo-di-dum
- Joined
- May 6, 2002
- Messages
- 1,518
- Reaction score
- 10
If anyone happens to know if there's a way to get a S3 Savage/IX on-board laptop graphics card to work with X, lemme know. This thing is just worthless. ...
kerely
kerely
hawkman
Head-Fier
- Joined
- Jan 29, 2003
- Messages
- 53
- Reaction score
- 0
I've been playing around with Debian lately. I'm not really a hardcore linux user, so I don't know what works best for what... I just used Debian cause it was the easiest distro to get running on my XBOX

neil
500+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Jun 20, 2001
- Messages
- 895
- Reaction score
- 11
Real men use Slackware.
I've been using Slackware since 94 or 95 (can't remember -- memory is a blur). And you know what? That's my kinda distribution. No goofy fancy install that requires that thing.. what do you call it? Oh yeah, a mouse. I mean, for the love of Pete, a mouse?
Once, I strayed because a server manufacturer sent me a bunch of Mandrake install CDs -- and during the installation process there were check boxes. And instead of checks, they used different colors to denote whether a box was checked or not. Well, on my monochrome screen, I couldn't tell what in the hell was going on, or not, so the moment I saw that <huck> GARBAGE. Honestly.
I mean, where in the hell would I be without the simplicity of /etc/rc.inet1 and /etc/rc.inet2? Let the distro wars begin!

Once, I strayed because a server manufacturer sent me a bunch of Mandrake install CDs -- and during the installation process there were check boxes. And instead of checks, they used different colors to denote whether a box was checked or not. Well, on my monochrome screen, I couldn't tell what in the hell was going on, or not, so the moment I saw that <huck> GARBAGE. Honestly.
I mean, where in the hell would I be without the simplicity of /etc/rc.inet1 and /etc/rc.inet2? Let the distro wars begin!

CaptBubba
Not dumb enough fora custom title...so he thought.
- Joined
- Jun 30, 2001
- Messages
- 1,615
- Reaction score
- 11
- Joined
- Jun 30, 2001
- Posts
- 1,615
- Likes
- 11
Funny this comes up now, as I just installed Redhat over Mandrake.
Much, much better than Mandrake. Don't know how to put it, but mandrake just didn't apeal to me, even the bootloader just looked stupid.
I really like Linux, but windows will probably always find a home on my computer.
Much, much better than Mandrake. Don't know how to put it, but mandrake just didn't apeal to me, even the bootloader just looked stupid.
I really like Linux, but windows will probably always find a home on my computer.
Zanth
SHAman who knew of Head-Fi ten years prior to its existence
- Joined
- Oct 11, 2001
- Messages
- 9,570
- Reaction score
- 37
- Joined
- Oct 11, 2001
- Posts
- 9,570
- Likes
- 37
Debian on my main box and development box and on my wife's computer and on the entertainment pc. FreeBSD on the router, and another BSD box working as a gateway between my apartment and a friend of mine.
lini
Thought the last line in Citizen Kane was nosebud.
- Joined
- Jun 22, 2001
- Messages
- 6,117
- Reaction score
- 22
For myself, it's none so far - but it will be Knoppix, soon. That's a Debian based distribution adapted by Peter Knopper, so that it can even be booted from its single CD without any hd installation. Package management seems superior and very easy with Debian compared to other distributions - and my personal Linux guru Jürgen is totally happy with Knoppix, as it comes with reasonable defaults for almost everything. He personally used SuSe and RedHat and did several distro comparisions for German computer magazines, before, but he says, Knoppix has been the best and easiest Linux so far...
Greetings from Munich!
Manfred / lini
Greetings from Munich!
Manfred / lini
Zanth
SHAman who knew of Head-Fi ten years prior to its existence
- Joined
- Oct 11, 2001
- Messages
- 9,570
- Reaction score
- 37
- Joined
- Oct 11, 2001
- Posts
- 9,570
- Likes
- 37
anything Debianish...is simply better.
Without a distro war starting...Debian is the only distro (maybe now...the only main distro...don't know about these new ones popping up) that sticks hard to the idea of OSS and more importantly FREE software.
As well, with apt, things are so easy after the initial install its nearly dumb not to go this way.
A little apt-get update;;apt-get dist-upgrade and we are golden!
How about compiling a kernel?
make-kpkg kernel_image_xxx
dpkg --install kernel_image_xxx
doesn't get easier than that.
Without a distro war starting...Debian is the only distro (maybe now...the only main distro...don't know about these new ones popping up) that sticks hard to the idea of OSS and more importantly FREE software.
As well, with apt, things are so easy after the initial install its nearly dumb not to go this way.
A little apt-get update;;apt-get dist-upgrade and we are golden!
How about compiling a kernel?
make-kpkg kernel_image_xxx
dpkg --install kernel_image_xxx
doesn't get easier than that.
penvzila
500+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Jun 30, 2002
- Messages
- 912
- Reaction score
- 11
Anyone know how to get a USB mouse runnig in Knoppix? The keyboard is fine, but the mouse connects to a USB port on the keyboard and wont work.
andrzejpw
May one day invent Bose-cancelling headphones.
- Joined
- Jun 25, 2001
- Messages
- 6,636
- Reaction score
- 10
I voted for gentoo, debian and other since knoppix is based on debian. . .
blessingx
HeadFest '07 Graphic Designer
Supplier of fine logos! His visions of Head-Fi
- Joined
- Mar 27, 2003
- Messages
- 13,179
- Reaction score
- 23
- Joined
- Mar 27, 2003
- Posts
- 13,179
- Likes
- 23
No reason, OSX/Fink is good enough Unix for me.
Did though use to run Knoppix and RedHat. By the way Knoppix had no problem detecting my USB mouse (Dell laptop or DIY desktop).

D-EJ915
He...or is it she...is a......Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Feb 13, 2003
- Messages
- 8,470
- Reaction score
- 10
RedHat sucks, but I've got 2 versions, don't ask why...Suse is far superior, it just is.