I just listened to that cover of "Bohemian Rhapsody." I must say, it's exactly what I thought it would be, which is a useless exercise. I just don't see the wisdom of trying to cover that song. I mean, what is an artist going to add to that song? How is an artist going to "improve" on the Queen version? Unless an artist has something new to bring to the song, then why bother covering it at all? That Puscifer cover sounds like someone just trying to prove to themselves that they could cover it. I'm sure it took a lot of work, but to my ears, it's worthless. It's just a note-for-note attempt to replicate the original that brings absolutely nothing new to the song. To me, it just ends up sounding like a weaker version of the original and it's got absolutely nothing new or creative about it. Why would someone waste what was probably a lot of time recording that?
