KamijoIsMyHero
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Oct 6, 2012
- Posts
- 1,540
- Likes
- 130
"more" signal is baseless, the stock cable is fine
First impressions of the UM pro 50:
1- Build quality is not superb, not surprisingly good, still good enough. I like the plastic finishing of the w4r better, and if i remember well the UM3x was similar. However the frosted clear plastic do expose the rough edges of the finish. The box says that this is hand crafted in the US by the same people that craft the custom fit series, however i still feel the shells are not overwhelmingly perfected.
2- Fit is impressive, for a 5 BA, i was worried that they had to change the shell of their universal series to fit them all in. Shure had to make the SE846 bigger to fit 4BAs and the low pass filter, compared to the 3 BAs SE535, thus making it less comfortable. Not the UM pro 50. It is amazingly comfortable. I never thought anything beats the w4r but it does. I am not sure if my mind is playing games on me cause i had low expectations, but it feels more comfortable than w4r and the Aurisonics ASG which is famous for its best fit
3- the new cable/connector is pretty good. I liked the 2 pins epic and was worried about the new one, the good thing is the cable is still the same at least in the UM Pro series, i think the W series will have non-helix cable. The new connector is better than shure especial because the ear piece itself is smaller than shures and the memory part over the ear is better, which makes the rotating connector less confusing than shure.
4- i dont have any of my other iems in office today so i cant compare A/B but from memory i can quickly see that this is a UM signature, but with a surprisingly great upper frequency clarity. It feels like a clearer version of w4r but as tight or even tighter than UM 3x in mid bass. The 2 extra BAs really doing some magic. The extra high freq BA solves my problem with BA phones when compared to dynamic drivers like IE800. I finally can hear accurate details of hi hats and other high freq instruments. I used to prefer dynamic drivers for that reason(even lower cost dynamic drivers like re400 had more enjoyable highs than w4r) the 2 high freq BA work like magic togther. Nice engineering from westone (they learned this specific configuration from their ES5). The extra mid freq BA brings the vocals and guitar closer. But mostly serves nicely in reliefing the one low BA from having to produce complete bass spectrum. The mid bass integrates perfectly with the mids, so i think it is generated more from the 2 mid BAs (i can feel that by how real the snare drum sounds). The only low freq BA is doing what it used to do in the UM3x, which is more than enough. I dont want to rush my self but i feel that this setup is better than 6 BA supposedly coming in both w60 and ES60. Westone's low frequency BAs really do a great job as solo, everyone noticed that in the w3 and UM3x. So this 5 configuration DOES NOT leave me craving for more bass, and acoustically it is known that integrating low frequencies from 2 sources (2 BAs) is very tricky and does not mean more bass, and sometimes mean more cancelling (um3 has more bass effect than w4 with 2 low freq BAs)
More to come later