Quote:
I am not against EQ myself if it is done right. The problem with 'the right EQ' often limits the listener to one particular setup and ends up no good for people like me, who own multiple setup and like to mix things around. Instead of trying so hard to make an imperfect headphone sounds good, I choose to appreciate the difference in sonic experience brought by these imperfections.
Well, I've tried to find one that needs zilch EQ to my ears. As of now, no such ideal is present, however GR07 are quite close other than the sibilance.
Funnily enough, using max. magnitude as the metric, M2 need less eq. Taking area total, GR07 wins.
(I don't count the bandwidth "widening" shelves in either case, they're completely optional.)
BTW, all important equalization on M2 is within 3 dB - which is pretty impressive "flatness".
M2 are completely unsuitable for monitoring without eq (dark and boomy), GR07 are very workable.
About eq limiting you to the single setup - the solution is deceptively simple - build your own portable eq. Deceptively simple, since making enough parametrics requires quite a bit of ingenuity to save space. (5x parametric+2 shelf should be enough for most every kind of adjustment) Not to mention the price of such a device will rival a single pair of high end IEMs.
Might be just as cheap to make and/or buy a portable digital effect box. (can be as simple as 2x mono-to-stereo convolver, just with great AD/DA)
About EQ artifacts: I used GR07 without eq for some time due to having setup issues... right before it failed. This detail difference is not due to EQ artifacts.
I bet it's a few small differences that add up to a better whole in my opinion. The most important one is the longer decay -
far better reverberation where it should be present and none where it should not be. (Unlike funny Sleek's SA6 presentation where it added "reverb" to everything except the lacking bass.)
---
However, search for
the IEMs that need no eq and have no fault (to my ears) continues. GR07 is not the end, but a nice step forward.
I suspect that j-phonics would be excellent, except the high end extension (16k tops? bad.) and perhaps armature-style low end timbre and decay...
Heck, Westones 4 didn't satisfy me timbre-wise. (Plus the bass is actually not linear to me, but smoothly rolls off below 40 Hz. The fit was as perfect as they come.)
Frequency response can be corrected - timbre (dynamics win) and detail (BAs win) cannot be corrected anywhere near as easily.
Soundstaging can sometimes be changed by deeper or shallower fit, but this depends on the exact design of the IEM.
---
TL;DR: Which one would be the best upgrade of these? Comments please.
- Monster Turbines Pro Gold (Might be possible to snatch a listen if I try real hard; ugly, will need a paint job)
- Futuresonics Atrio v2 (w/ MG7) (I'd have to set up a credit card just for these...)
- Radius HP-TWF21 (DDM2)
- Hifiman RE272
Off the list due to "sparklies" are:
- Panasonic RP-HJE900 (I've caught a listen of these)
Funny, nobody makes BA + dynamic dual driver IEMs yet. Could be a killer combination if tuned right.