I hope they fit, the damn things are almost as big as a D-Cell battery hehe, I opened up my dac and looked again and there's not nearly as much room as the picture makes it out to be. Good luck, and some pic's would be nice when it's all done.
Actually I also opened up my older 2.1 dac and compared them side by side, and I think I was mistaken to which one has more space, the luxery version just has so much more jammed into it, reclocker board, bigger power supply and the filter caps, and it's also got larger digital decoupling capacitors, they are about twice as tall as the ones in my 2.1 dac. I also noticed my older 2.1 dac seemed to be put together much better, it looks like a pro job compared to my Luxery version, which in comparison seems dirty, and sloppy. The 2.1 board is very clean, where the 3.0 Version had hair in it, and lots of Flux, and alot more scorch marks, and alot of the caps don't sit flush to the board, and on the actual Dac chips section all the solder looks milky and the PCB has what appears to be dried fluid stians, as if this board where the last one in the box sitting on the docks. (moist enviroment). I guess the Rookie put mine together, perhaps I just expect to much out of china, my Head Direct EF-1 is much much better put together though. (also a china product) My Clock crystals also say Teradak on them instead of Valab like the ones in all the pictures. I know Teradak is the oem for valab products, but untill this point all the valab dac's have had "Valab" enscribed clocks. I can't find much information on 45mhz TCXO's what little info I did find leads me to believe they are for scientific measuring instruments and not tailored for audio.
Dac's closing in on 80 hrs now, really starting to open up and sound better, this pretty much exactly mirror's the way my 2.1 dac broke in, but their are obvious improvments in clairity and resolution (as compared to 2.1 dac), and also bass slam, but it's hard to get a handle on how much of an improvement until the dac's fully broke in.
I wonder if adding a pulse transformer to the coax will have as signifigant a differnce for me as it does for the older dacs without the reclocker board, the reclocker may completely mitigate the need for a coupling transformer, it certainly couldent hurt though.