Curly21029
500+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Jun 7, 2010
- Posts
- 912
- Likes
- 47
Quote:
I second... just about every word of this. (I've never owned the Signature Pro's, however)
I assessed the treble range of the PRO 900 to exhibit a highly metallic sheen whilst the bass was presented as an indistinct cloud that formed OVER the top of the presentation with bass-heavy content. The M-100's signature isn't as dramatically v-shaped, it doesn't exhibit high-end harshness, and the bass stays in the basement (for the most part) and never becomes offensive. The PRO 900 earpads are comfy, however.
To my ears, they are not even close, particularly the harsh, grating highs on the Pro 900 reminiscent of nails on a chalkboard compared to silky smooth, if less extended, highs with no sibilance on the M-100. Bass is more prominent on the Pro 900 but more controlled on the M-100. It's not that I don't like Ultrasone- I am a fan of the Edition 8 and Sig Pro, but the Pro 900 is actually painful to my ears with such a dramatic v-curve.
I second... just about every word of this. (I've never owned the Signature Pro's, however)
I assessed the treble range of the PRO 900 to exhibit a highly metallic sheen whilst the bass was presented as an indistinct cloud that formed OVER the top of the presentation with bass-heavy content. The M-100's signature isn't as dramatically v-shaped, it doesn't exhibit high-end harshness, and the bass stays in the basement (for the most part) and never becomes offensive. The PRO 900 earpads are comfy, however.