dbdynsty25
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Aug 25, 2010
- Posts
- 2,283
- Likes
- 257
Quote:
Why? I'm perfectly happy with my amps.
Go and do some more research.
Why? I'm perfectly happy with my amps.
Go and do some more research.
Why? I'm perfectly happy with my amps.
Hmm well amps can have an effect on the sound quality. If ALL they do is make it louder.... Then something like the Burston headphone amp at £900 better go LOUD! You can get most headphones to deafening levels with a cheapo £50 amplifier.
That's why I said they don't noticeably change per se. Yes, all amps have some coloration and change it a bit, but I personally cannot tell the difference between the Fiios I've got. Maybe it's just the Fiio house sound that I'm used to and I like it. In reality, the point of an amp is not to change the sound, that's an EQ.
Yes, that is what he said.
What are you expecting it to improve exactly? Most amps main goal is to amplify and clean up the sound, while giving you more headroom for turning them up louder. They don't really noticably change the sound per se...at least from my experience with the E6, E07K, E11, E12 & E17 (FIIO FOR LIFE, lol).
My M100s arrived today and I'm very impressed! Whilst the bass is indeed the focus its much cleaner and tighter than I feared it might be, and played flat they are absolutely perfect for my electronic music. Reduce the bass a few decibels and they are perfect for all my other genres. Very satisfied!
So then it would be an unfair comparison to say VERZA > E11 in the first place, no?
Nice! I also have a question for you guys, how would you describe the bass/lows on the M100, and also on the M80. I just want to see if I am experencing the same thing. My M100s are going to be sent in for an exchange repair, so I might be getting a white one in return! I always like the matte black, but white seems to show the details more. But lets see! Do you guys like the white, I know tealrice returned his because his white was more of a creme color. But I remember some time ago we had this battle/hype thing with the colors.
congrats! wow that was some speedy delivery! you were talking about ordering them just a few days ago werent you? anyway, im glad to see that youre eqing successfully. if you play around abit, youll find youre learning quite a bit aswell =]
well technically your probably right, the main "goal" is to amplify, but thats not the only advantage. impedance conversion is one thing that an amp gives you, i think these days a low impedance of ~2 ohm or even less has become more or less standard, which theoretically allows for your headphones' "true" sound to come out, without any changes due to impedance miss-matches.
other than that, just because your headphones get loud enough, doesnt mean they are "properly driven". an amp provides the cans with as much power as they need, and can provide the sufficient current/voltage swing when called for, something that a phone may not be able to.
all that being said, i agree that the differences, and especially with "easy to drive" headphones such as the m-100, are hardly night and day. i remember at first i couldnt tell any difference whatever between the m-100 with, vs, without an external amp. but then i started to use them portably more often, and came to realize that what i was hearing when driven from my phone - even in quiet places- was simply not as good as when driven by my O2 at home. i find the soundstage improves quite a bit, and the bass becomes more "textured", or "layered" when driven from the O2. again, im sure if i let one of my flatmates try they wouldnt hear a single difference. its subtle, but, atleast to me, noticeable. once more, the m-100 arent exactly the right can to demonstrate the advantages of an external amp. with my dt 770 (250) for example, the difference is quite drastic.
congrats! wow that was some speedy delivery! you were talking about ordering them just a few days ago werent you? anyway, im glad to see that youre eqing successfully. if you play around abit, youll find youre learning quite a bit aswell =]