shamrock134
1000+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Jul 5, 2010
- Posts
- 1,148
- Likes
- 32
I'd say find a way to audition them somehow before buying either.
I think what affected the bass the most for me was putting in additional layers of material inside the cup. I don't notice a huge difference with changing out the felts on the outside. My impression from KeeS's post was that the outer felt pads were to get rid of the metallic sounding treble. I could be wrong though.
my silver dragon (imo) got rid of that , that didn't go away with 400 hours of burn in and an amp
So my Pro2900s arrived today. I'm guessing I'm the only one that currently owns both the pro900 and the pro2900.
I'm not goning to make any premature judgments, but these might very well be the headphones you are looking for MetroBBOY.
More on that soon...
So my Pro2900s arrived today. I'm guessing I'm the only one that currently owns both the pro900 and the pro2900.
I'm not goning to make any premature judgments, but these might very well be the headphones you are looking for MetroBBOY.
More on that soon...
It's unfortunate you aren't enjoying them, but I can't imagine your impressions will change due to 'burn-in'. What are you running them with? Can you still return them before it's too late?
Already posted a much larger initial assessment of these in the gaming headphone thread, but here's the condensed version:
1. The default cables probably are extremely inefficient. It's nice that they have the screw in feature, but I had a lot of problems with the straight cable. It took me four attempts to even get it to lock into place correctly. I had no issues with the coiled cable.
2. These require an amp OR nothing but lossless audio. It's already been stated that they accentuate the flaws in lossless audio, and that's an understatement.
3. The default black pads suck, period. They leak too much, and also barely isolate more than an open headphone.
4. Will these "get better" after 40 - 200 hours of burn in? Who knows. There's not been any real scientific proof that it has any drastic effect on the sound, and most reports are anecdotal. Some of these cases could be true, but often it's a matter of you simply acclimating to the sound. I'm not really able to judge one way or another yet, so I'll save that criticism for two or three months from now. Out of the box the bass is "fine", but it's nowhere near what I was expecting from all of the complaints as well as praises. There is a very minor bump at certain frequencies, but it doesn't actually sound that much better than a cheap pair of HD280s (which people seem to love to trash, but they were kings of their price bracket for a very long time).
If recabling and repadding these ends up bringing out their "true" nature, then great. Except, if you're literally required to spend an additional $350 just for the extra parts, it almost makes them seem like a complete waste of money over simply spending $350 + what you paid for the 900s and just buying another pair of headphones that are better by default.