benzoylmethyl
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Jun 26, 2011
- Posts
- 330
- Likes
- 15
So these things are about what I expected, honestly. I think if they were my first set of headfi cans, I wouldn't buy another set, ever. However, they aren't, and because of that...I'm just not that happy with them. They are very good all-'rounders for a basshead on the go, I would think, but they're certainly no XB700s.
They're more difficult to drive, as is evidenced by the fact that I had to crank foobar up from about 30% to about 80%, going straight from the 700s to the PROs. The bass doesn't get as low, nor is it as thick, full, textured, or--though it may catch me some flak around here--as impactful as the bass on the 700s. :-/ That's not to say it's not there. It is, and it's very good, clean, high quality bass. But it's just not what it's hyped to be.
There are a few things that have surprised me...The sound stage is pretty amazing. I have to admit, I'm one of the ones who is now an S-Logic fan. I have a couple of go-to songs for bass testing, most of which I am ridiculously familiar with. One of them is Far East Movement's "Like a G6"--it got so much airtime that it's ingrained into my brain. I never once realized that at about the 3 minute mark, there is a part where the track mixing roams from waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay out in left field to waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay out in right field. In my wife's BMW, in my JL-based Rav4 system, on any of my other cans...I've never noticed it until these. It was trippy as hell.
The highs are not piercing, and though they can sound a little "metallic" (I don't really like using words like that to describe sound, but whatever), they never sound bad. Very detailed and precise, is what I would say, rather than metallic. I found the Grado SR60i's to be too harsh for me, and these are not that harsh. I've been listening to them for about an hour or so, and I don't have any signs of fatigue yet. Some songs are little hot, but it's more exciting and less stab-in-the-ears.
They are pretty friggin comfortable, though much bigger than they look in pics. Kinda heavy, too. My ears aren't as hot and sweaty in these as they get in my 700s.
I like them enough to consider upgrading, so please don't take this review as negative despite the overall tone of it. I don't dislike anything about them, which is a very good thing; but if these are exemplary of the bass in the US lineup, I think it's overhyped. I just didn't get that ****-eating grin I got when I first tugged the big ol' XB700s on my head.
Which brings me to my question(s)...how do these compare to the PRO900s? How is the bass on these vs the 900s, and is the treble on the 900s spikier?
They're more difficult to drive, as is evidenced by the fact that I had to crank foobar up from about 30% to about 80%, going straight from the 700s to the PROs. The bass doesn't get as low, nor is it as thick, full, textured, or--though it may catch me some flak around here--as impactful as the bass on the 700s. :-/ That's not to say it's not there. It is, and it's very good, clean, high quality bass. But it's just not what it's hyped to be.
There are a few things that have surprised me...The sound stage is pretty amazing. I have to admit, I'm one of the ones who is now an S-Logic fan. I have a couple of go-to songs for bass testing, most of which I am ridiculously familiar with. One of them is Far East Movement's "Like a G6"--it got so much airtime that it's ingrained into my brain. I never once realized that at about the 3 minute mark, there is a part where the track mixing roams from waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay out in left field to waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay out in right field. In my wife's BMW, in my JL-based Rav4 system, on any of my other cans...I've never noticed it until these. It was trippy as hell.
The highs are not piercing, and though they can sound a little "metallic" (I don't really like using words like that to describe sound, but whatever), they never sound bad. Very detailed and precise, is what I would say, rather than metallic. I found the Grado SR60i's to be too harsh for me, and these are not that harsh. I've been listening to them for about an hour or so, and I don't have any signs of fatigue yet. Some songs are little hot, but it's more exciting and less stab-in-the-ears.
They are pretty friggin comfortable, though much bigger than they look in pics. Kinda heavy, too. My ears aren't as hot and sweaty in these as they get in my 700s.
I like them enough to consider upgrading, so please don't take this review as negative despite the overall tone of it. I don't dislike anything about them, which is a very good thing; but if these are exemplary of the bass in the US lineup, I think it's overhyped. I just didn't get that ****-eating grin I got when I first tugged the big ol' XB700s on my head.
Which brings me to my question(s)...how do these compare to the PRO900s? How is the bass on these vs the 900s, and is the treble on the 900s spikier?