UFO sighting in China

Jul 17, 2010 at 8:49 AM Post #16 of 76
so photoshop'ed that it's not even funny
narzo.gif

 
Jul 17, 2010 at 10:13 AM Post #18 of 76
Man that photoshop was so awesome that it was detected by radars, lol!
It amazes me how people prefer to give stupid explanation instead of accepting facts, but believe their tradition.
 
Jul 17, 2010 at 12:13 PM Post #19 of 76
Meaning accepting the fact that it is an unidentified flying object or the 'fact' that it means aliens?
 
Jul 17, 2010 at 12:23 PM Post #20 of 76


Quote:
It kind of just looks like an airplane with its landing lights on after motion blur, a poor quality camera, and haze catching some of that light.


This. It really looks like camera+slow shutter speed+airplane.
 
Jul 17, 2010 at 12:35 PM Post #21 of 76
Man. With 13 billion people who own an average of five cameras and two videocorders per household all that was recorded were three crumby pictures?
 
What a jip!
 

 
Jul 17, 2010 at 12:42 PM Post #22 of 76
Un-identified object, something different, aliens whatever.
 
In a world that everyone believes that we are here by EVOLUTION, how come we deny the possibility of evolution to other planets?
Is that because we want to be the gods of the world and so afraid of losing this position?
one wonders...
 
Quote:
Meaning accepting the fact that it is an unidentified flying object or the 'fact' that it means aliens?



 
Jul 17, 2010 at 12:52 PM Post #23 of 76

Quote:
Un-identified object, something different, aliens whatever.
 
In a world that everyone believes that we are here by EVOLUTION, how come we deny the possibility of evolution to other planets?
Is that because we want to be the gods of the world and so afraid of losing this position?
one wonders...


Probably because other planets are really, really far away and really, really unlikely to have a habitable environment like ours. Also because it's really, really unlikely that our primitive detection methods (like crappy cameras) would be able to pick up on a spacecraft advanced enough to travel that distance in a reasonable time before that spacecraft vaporizes our planet/rains flowers and love down upon our tortured souls.
 
Also I'm not sure you know what a fact is.
 
Jul 17, 2010 at 12:56 PM Post #24 of 76
 
Man that photoshop was so awesome that it was detected by radars, lol!
It amazes me how people prefer to give stupid explanation instead of accepting facts, but believe their tradition.


So tell me, what's the most stupid? to remain dubious until proven otherwise, or to believe whatever you see on some random website huh?
 
Who shot those photos? Were the RAW files/negatives analyzed for authenticity? By who?
 
There's no question that radars all over the world catch "weird" stuff everyday, and there's no question that aliens do exist...humans have been drawing grays since the beginning of times, these are well verifiable facts.
 
Even many photos have been deemed as NOT fake: http://www.ufocasebook.com/bestufopictures.html
 
you should check out the "KREEL REPORT".
 
Jul 17, 2010 at 12:59 PM Post #26 of 76
These kind of statement makes me laugh. I am sorry.
It is kind of "if evolution was caused to evolve here with these condition, it means that these are the condition for evolution".
This is not evolution. evolution means evolve according to the environment. 
It seems wiser for one to consider the possibility of evolution according to what exists in each condition. Our life is kind of water based, it could he sulfur or what ever based. Since it is evolution it can adapt to whatever condition it begins in.
 
Well one never knows what technology they have, and one never knows if our poor photo camera is not the most advanced resource to spot their technology.
 
Well I am not assuming that was an alien or whatever, and I am not assuming that Aliens really exists. It is just a point of pure logics. IT doesn't even mean I believe in the premises which I refer here. I am just using what is generally taken for "true" to show a point.
Quote:
Probably because other planets are really, really far away and really, really unlikely to have a habitable environment like ours. Also because it's really, really unlikely that our primitive detection methods (like crappy cameras) would be able to pick up on a spacecraft advanced enough to travel that distance in a reasonable time before that spacecraft vaporizes our planet.



 
Jul 17, 2010 at 1:02 PM Post #27 of 76
Funny I agree with you. Well the existence of aliens is a possibility, with high odds...
I am just sad with the rejection first reaction.
Quote:
 

So tell me, what's the most stupid? to remain dubious until proven otherwise, or to believe whatever you see on some random website huh?
 
Who shot those photos? Were the RAW files/negatives analyzed for authenticity? By who?
 
There's no question that radars all over the world catch "weird" stuff everyday, and there's no question that aliens do exist...humans have been drawing grays since the beginning of times, these are well verifiable facts:
 
Even many photos have been deemed as NOT fake: http://www.ufocasebook.com/bestufopictures.html
 
you should check out the "KREEL REPORT".



 
Jul 17, 2010 at 1:02 PM Post #28 of 76


Quote:
Probably because other planets are really, really far away and really, really unlikely to have a habitable environment like ours. Also because it's really, really unlikely that our primitive detection methods (like crappy cameras) would be able to pick up on a spacecraft advanced enough to travel that distance in a reasonable time before that spacecraft vaporizes our planet/rains flowers and love down upon our tortured souls.
 
Also I'm not sure you know what a fact is.


With more planets than we can fathom, the possibility of other life is quite plausible-- to the point where no one could correctly say that alien life does or does not exist. Let's just hope the mobile oppression palace never finds us.
 

 
 
Jul 17, 2010 at 1:07 PM Post #29 of 76
Funny thing is that you seem to not know what is a fact. you should read your wiki link. I didn't see it first.
well I was just saying it could be possible to be real, instead of just rejecting as we don't understand it.
scientifically what I said was right, funny thing nothing in science is certain. 
 
Quote:
Probably because other planets are really, really far away and really, really unlikely to have a habitable environment like ours. Also because it's really, really unlikely that our primitive detection methods (like crappy cameras) would be able to pick up on a spacecraft advanced enough to travel that distance in a reasonable time before that spacecraft vaporizes our planet/rains flowers and love down upon our tortured souls.
 
Also I'm not sure you know what a fact is.



 
Jul 17, 2010 at 1:21 PM Post #30 of 76
Quote:
These kind of statement makes me laugh. I am sorry.
It is kind of "if evolution was caused to evolve here with these condition, it means that these are the condition for evolution".
This is not evolution. evolution means evolve according to the environment. 
It seems wiser for one to consider the possibility of evolution according to what exists in each condition. Our life is kind of water based, it could he sulfur or what ever based. Since it is evolution it can adapt to whatever condition it begins in.
 
Well one never knows what technology they have, and one never knows if our poor photo camera is not the most advanced resource to spot their technology.
 
Well I am not assuming that was an alien or whatever, and I am not assuming that Aliens really exists. It is just a point of pure logics. IT doesn't even mean I believe in the premises which I refer here. I am just using what is generally taken for "true" to show a point.

 


There are still laws of physics that have to be followed, though. Unlikely any life will survive on a planet the size of Jupiter because of gravitational forces, and that's the only kind of planet we've been able to find (as it's easier to see). Also unlikely any life will survive on a planet much closer than our own to its sun. Also, there are only so many possible chemical reactions and only so many that would be able to support life. There are limits to evolution, which is why we don't see critters living on the moon.
 
It's unlikely an alien species exists in our close vicinity, less likely that they have better technology than we do (who's to say these species are intelligent?), still less likely that we would be able to detect them if they did and didn't want us to (why would they just hover around and not pop out with a greeting?), and even less likely that they would arrive on our little dustball out of all the other planets around.
 
Talking pure chance, I have a hard time believing we'll make alien contact any time soon. No facts. It's hard to bring facts into a discussion of hypotheticals.
 
Quote:
With more planets than we can fathom, the possibility of other life is quite plausible-- to the point where no one could correctly say that alien life does or does not exist. Let's just hope the mobile oppression palace never finds us.
 

 


More planets = less likely anyone will choose ours for a road trip. Yeah, life probably exists. But are we being visited?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top