leeperry
Galvanically isolated his brain
- Joined
- Apr 23, 2004
- Posts
- 13,916
- Likes
- 2,119
so photoshop'ed that it's not even funny

so photoshop'ed that it's not even funny![]()
It kind of just looks like an airplane with its landing lights on after motion blur, a poor quality camera, and haze catching some of that light.
Meaning accepting the fact that it is an unidentified flying object or the 'fact' that it means aliens?
Un-identified object, something different, aliens whatever.
In a world that everyone believes that we are here by EVOLUTION, how come we deny the possibility of evolution to other planets?
Is that because we want to be the gods of the world and so afraid of losing this position?
one wonders...
Man that photoshop was so awesome that it was detected by radars, lol!
It amazes me how people prefer to give stupid explanation instead of accepting facts, but believe their tradition.
Even many photos have been deemed as NOT fake: http://www.ufocasebook.com/bestufopictures.html
Probably because other planets are really, really far away and really, really unlikely to have a habitable environment like ours. Also because it's really, really unlikely that our primitive detection methods (like crappy cameras) would be able to pick up on a spacecraft advanced enough to travel that distance in a reasonable time before that spacecraft vaporizes our planet.
So tell me, what's the most stupid? to remain dubious until proven otherwise, or to believe whatever you see on some random website huh?
Who shot those photos? Were the RAW files/negatives analyzed for authenticity? By who?
There's no question that radars all over the world catch "weird" stuff everyday, and there's no question that aliens do exist...humans have been drawing grays since the beginning of times, these are well verifiable facts:
Even many photos have been deemed as NOT fake: http://www.ufocasebook.com/bestufopictures.html
you should check out the "KREEL REPORT".
Probably because other planets are really, really far away and really, really unlikely to have a habitable environment like ours. Also because it's really, really unlikely that our primitive detection methods (like crappy cameras) would be able to pick up on a spacecraft advanced enough to travel that distance in a reasonable time before that spacecraft vaporizes our planet/rains flowers and love down upon our tortured souls.
Also I'm not sure you know what a fact is.
Probably because other planets are really, really far away and really, really unlikely to have a habitable environment like ours. Also because it's really, really unlikely that our primitive detection methods (like crappy cameras) would be able to pick up on a spacecraft advanced enough to travel that distance in a reasonable time before that spacecraft vaporizes our planet/rains flowers and love down upon our tortured souls.
Also I'm not sure you know what a fact is.
These kind of statement makes me laugh. I am sorry.
It is kind of "if evolution was caused to evolve here with these condition, it means that these are the condition for evolution".
This is not evolution. evolution means evolve according to the environment.
It seems wiser for one to consider the possibility of evolution according to what exists in each condition. Our life is kind of water based, it could he sulfur or what ever based. Since it is evolution it can adapt to whatever condition it begins in.
Well one never knows what technology they have, and one never knows if our poor photo camera is not the most advanced resource to spot their technology.
Well I am not assuming that was an alien or whatever, and I am not assuming that Aliens really exists. It is just a point of pure logics. IT doesn't even mean I believe in the premises which I refer here. I am just using what is generally taken for "true" to show a point.
With more planets than we can fathom, the possibility of other life is quite plausible-- to the point where no one could correctly say that alien life does or does not exist. Let's just hope the mobile oppression palace never finds us.