Tiny DAC, Big Sound, Evolved – Stoner Acoustics UD100 / UD110 / UD120
Sep 11, 2014 at 9:25 PM Post #841 of 1,162
  What is ASIO and is there even any music, hell, games, that support 32/384? What about 32/192? Is it really able to do that all through just USB?
 

 
This is ASIO: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Audio_Stream_Input/Output
 
ASIO is already included within the Bravo driver you need to install for UD120, so it is pretty much all set to go except that you need to use a software player that supports it (Foobar, Jriver, MediaMonkey, etc)
 
Don't really know any games or music that requires 32/384 at the moment, so it is mostly for future proofing. 24/192 music however is getting more and more common.
 
Of course it can do all of them through USB.
 
Sep 11, 2014 at 9:29 PM Post #842 of 1,162
   
This is ASIO: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Audio_Stream_Input/Output
 
ASIO is already included within the Bravo driver you need to install for UD120, so it is pretty much all set to go except that you need to use a software player that supports it (Foobar, Jriver, MediaMonkey, etc)
 
Don't really know any games or music that requires 32/384 at the moment, so it is mostly for future proofing. 24/192 music however is getting more and more common.
 
Of course it can do all of them through USB.

Sweet! I have.. spotify, lol. I don't really download music. Wonder if I could use it with that. Yeah, I read that 24/96 can actually be better though. Don't remember where I read it.
 
Sep 11, 2014 at 9:49 PM Post #843 of 1,162
  Sweet! I have.. spotify, lol. I don't really download music. Wonder if I could use it with that. Yeah, I read that 24/96 can actually be better though. Don't remember where I read it.

 
Spotify won't benefit from 32/384. I'll say 24/96 is more than enough.
 
Sep 11, 2014 at 9:52 PM Post #844 of 1,162
   
Spotify won't benefit from 32/384. I'll say 24/96 is more than enough.


I do I even go about getting 24bit/96khz from Spotify? Can I do it by running the web player version or do I need to download the desktop version? I'd just attach my headphones to the amp, which would be connected to the DAC, which are then connected to my lappy.
 
Sep 11, 2014 at 11:08 PM Post #845 of 1,162
I am not a Spotify user, but as far as I know, Spotify is 16/44.1 with lossy compression. Setting the UD120 to 24/96 will oversample the signal by default. Oversample to even higher birdepth/bitdepth won't really improve it further.
 
Sep 11, 2014 at 11:11 PM Post #846 of 1,162
  I am not a Spotify user, but as far as I know, Spotify is 16/44.1 with lossy compression. Setting the UD120 to 24/96 will oversample the signal by default. Oversample to even higher birdepth/bitdepth won't really improve it further.


That sounds... not good at all. Where does the premium 320kbps come in here if it's 44.1khz? Confused.
 
Sep 11, 2014 at 11:19 PM Post #847 of 1,162
 
That sounds... not good at all. Where does the premium 320kbps come in here if it's 44.1khz? Confused.

 
With only 320kbps of bandwidth, it is no likely to be lossless. Since it is not lossless, it is not likely to be HiRes either. However, 16/44,1 is more than enough to cover all human's listening need. With 24bit, we get more headroom to adjust for digital volume without affecting the resolution of the signal. Oversampling the signal to 96kHz mainly to push sampling noise higher into the inaudible range, which should give you a cleaner sound. The point is that you want to take advantage on things you can, but you can't take advantage of thing that is not there.
 
Sep 11, 2014 at 11:21 PM Post #848 of 1,162
   
With only 320kbps of bandwidth, it is no likely to be lossless. Since it is not lossless, it is not likely to be HiRes either. However, 16/44,1 is more than enough to cover all human's listening need. With 24bit, we get more headroom to adjust for digital volume without affecting the resolution of the signal. Oversampling the signal to 96kHz mainly to push sampling noise higher into the inaudible range, which should give you a cleaner sound. The point is that you want to take advantage on things you can, but you can't take advantage of thing that is not there.


I see, so where do I get quality music then? I guess I'd have to download them individually eh? I really liked the subscription based service like Spotify so I can download unlimited whatever. Much cheaper that way.
 
Sep 11, 2014 at 11:26 PM Post #849 of 1,162
 
I see, so where do I get quality music then? I guess I'd have to download them individually eh? I really liked the subscription based service like Spotify so I can download unlimited whatever. Much cheaper that way.

 
Well, there are a few sites that sell HD music. HDtracks.com for an example, just google for more.
 
Sep 11, 2014 at 11:28 PM Post #850 of 1,162
Not everyone can hear the difference between lossy & lossless music, so there is a chance that the Spotify you are currently listening to is pretty much perfect as it is without any need to try to find something of higher quality
 
Sep 11, 2014 at 11:33 PM Post #851 of 1,162
   
Well, there are a few sites that sell HD music. HDtracks.com for an example, just google for more.

All right. Thank youu.
 
Not everyone can hear the difference between lossy & lossless music, so there is a chance that the Spotify you are currently listening to is pretty much perfect as it is without any need to try to find something of higher quality

Maybe so. Will have to listen to find out though.
 
Sep 11, 2014 at 11:37 PM Post #852 of 1,162
Not everyone can hear the difference between lossy & lossless music, so there is a chance that the Spotify you are currently listening to is pretty much perfect as it is without any need to try to find something of higher quality

+1. most ppl cannot tell the difference between 320kbps mp3s vs flac in a blind listening test.
 
Sep 11, 2014 at 11:39 PM Post #853 of 1,162
  +1. most ppl cannot tell the difference between 320kbps mp3s vs flac in a blind listening test.

Yeah, but what about 16bit/44.1 vs 24bit/96?
 
Sep 11, 2014 at 11:49 PM Post #854 of 1,162
That sounds... not good at all. Where does the premium 320kbps come in here if it's 44.1khz? Confused.

The 320k is actually the bit rate not the sampling rate ie 44.1 88.2 384 etc., a lot of people get them confused. I doubt a lot of people would be able to tell the difference between a 320k mp3 to a flac or wave. Standard cd's bit rates are around 1100k the sampling rate is 44.1k
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top