Interesting stuff indeed. But I suspect you missed my points. Never mind.
My research field is social dynamics (group behavior within small and large contexts), I'm an ex-lecturer in social dynamics and discourse, am trained in statistics and psychometrics and act from time to time as a research consultant and statistician in both this and the medical field. So there is certainly overlap between my area and yours - although I certainly don't claim anything like your expertise with signal processing and sound measurement. The point though is that many of the measures I developed in the past were cognition and perception based., i.e. somewhat akin to the audiophile phenomenology. What others call "subjective" psychometricians will often go ahead and measure - with the usual requirements that they be repeatable, achieve adequate standards of reliability and achieve validity with respect to some well-founded and well-argued construct.
My comment that 'the audiophile experience' is not a hot research topic was meant seriously. There is
no way I or anyone within my faculty could have hoped to attract funding for this kind of thing. Nor were my literature searches some years back particularly fruitful - although I could well have not used the right terms!
Yes, be wary of Amos (Currowong) - he's always watching