Thoughts on a bunch of DACs (and why delta-sigma kinda sucks, just to get you to think about stuff)

Aug 3, 2014 at 10:07 PM Post #1,082 of 6,500
  Last time was USB via macbook to DNA Stratus (new one with the upgrades) and Shuguang big bottle 2A3s. 

 
Did you use the Hugo in line-out mode, or with the volume set at max?
 
Aug 3, 2014 at 10:24 PM Post #1,084 of 6,500
  Line-out mode. With the volume in line, the Hugo was terribad.

 
There's the problem. The Hugo puts out 3V in line out mode, which overloads some amps that don't have volume on the input. Try it again if you can with the HD-800s plugged in directly. They are fine directly from the Hugo. Give it at least 10 minutes to warm up a bit first though. 
 
Aug 3, 2014 at 10:49 PM Post #1,085 of 6,500
3V isn't going to overload the Stratus' input stage considering the volume pot wasn't even cranked up. With the HD800 or UERMs plugged directly in to the Hugo, I didn't care for the Hugo at all (in other words, it was like What, why are people saying this is great). Directly plugged in, the Hugo sounded dead. AKM120 + UERM destroyed Hugo, keeping in mind AK240 was step backward sonically (flat and boring) to AK120.
 
Aug 3, 2014 at 10:59 PM Post #1,086 of 6,500
The master 7 is good via coax as well, it just has to be a good transport and I think the two different coax inputs(RCA and bnc) use different receivers? I remember people saying one was better than the other in the past


How much of a difference can a transport make? I heard a difference between oppo 103 and a old sacd player to my nuforce dac-100 but thought I was just hearing things. Isn't it just relaying the 010101s?
 
Aug 3, 2014 at 11:01 PM Post #1,087 of 6,500
  3V isn't going to overload the Stratus' input stage considering the volume pot wasn't even cranked up. With the HD800 or UERMs plugged directly in to the Hugo, I didn't care for the Hugo at all (in other words, it was like What, why are people saying this is great). Directly plugged in, the Hugo sounded dead. AKM120 + UERM destroyed Hugo, keeping in mind AK240 was step backward sonically (flat and boring) to AK120.

 
 
   
There's the problem. The Hugo puts out 3V in line out mode, which overloads some amps that don't have volume on the input. Try it again if you can with the HD-800s plugged in directly. They are fine directly from the Hugo. Give it at least 10 minutes to warm up a bit first though. 

 
 
I think it's perfectly fine for Purrin to prefer other DAC's sound over Hugo and I'm sure he knows what he's doing as in not clipping the amp input.  From his comparison notes and posts (and the fact he prefers the original AK120 over the AK240) you can see his preference.  SearchofSub also seems to have similar preference that prefers warmth over details/neutrality.  I also have friends locally who prefers the X5 sound over Hugo saying Hugo.  Bottomline is that I learn how wide different preferences can varies.  Thought personally I would never be able to agree AK120 sounds better than AK240 or Hugo.  I believe there had been enough high praises for the Hugo (myself a accomplice) and it is good to also have folks like Purrin sharing a different views.
 
Aug 3, 2014 at 11:17 PM Post #1,088 of 6,500
How much of a difference can a transport make? I heard a difference between oppo 103 and a old sacd player to my nuforce dac-100 but thought I was just hearing things. Isn't it just relaying the 010101s?

 
A transport can make 30-60% of the sound of the DAC. Yes, it's relaying 01010101s, and in theory, it should only be jitter at the DAC chip digitial input pins which matters. But why does the Schiit Wyrd work magic when it shouldn't, even with $10,000 DACs? I've messed around with DAC internals to know that even the slightest changes make differences, e.g. change a regulator, different sound.
 
We can even consider USB to coax / i2s converters as "transports", just that they do not use CD but USB from a PC instead. Heck, even the type of computer makes a difference. Macbooks have a tendency to sound bad (digital glare) from USB, Mac desktops sound good, Windows machines have a certain sound, etc.
 
The Master 7 is highly dependent upon quality of transport and hence why I have a slight hesitancy to recommend it. Use a crappy or badly matching CD transport, and the potential of the Master 7 gets severely gimped.
 
Aug 3, 2014 at 11:32 PM Post #1,089 of 6,500
I thought Vega was different, since a pro reviewer at audiostream said it was very musical and gave credit to him and this OP saying it was "Sabre done right"..

 
By SABRE done right, I meant the designer did not try to artificially warm things up and make the Vega into something it was never good at doing. A example of this is the Invicta DAC. Ressossossonace tried to warm up the sound of the Invicta and just ended up with a mess: a juxtaposition of mud, stridency, congestion, especially when recordings got complex. Yes, the Invicta almost had me fooled, but SABRE always shows!  Invicta is like trying to cure a gay guy or trying to make a 4000 lbs Camaro handle like a GT86. You can try to do it, but the results are never good.
 
So Vega simply took advantage of what the SABRE does well (hyperdetail, attack, microdynamics, etc.) and worked with that and made it really good. It remains a bright DAC. EXACT mode with USB helps quite a lot with providing a more liquid sound with a less "robotic" treble timbre. So I really do appreciate Auralic for making the Vega the way it is despite myself not 100% into that kind of sound.
 
I am basically looking for master 7 sound chracteristics but sound just as good with coaxial input. Usb wont be used.
 

See post above on transports and master 7. From coax sources I tried, Master 7 is quite warm with "PCM1704" bass for lack of a better term. I did enjoy the Master 7 via coax sources (ranked #5).
 
Aug 3, 2014 at 11:51 PM Post #1,090 of 6,500

 
  3V isn't going to overload the Stratus' input stage considering the volume pot wasn't even cranked up. With the HD800 or UERMs plugged directly in to the Hugo, I didn't care for the Hugo at all (in other words, it was like What, why are people saying this is great). Directly plugged in, the Hugo sounded dead. AKM120 + UERM destroyed Hugo, keeping in mind AK240 was step backward sonically (flat and boring) to AK120.

 
 
   
There's the problem. The Hugo puts out 3V in line out mode, which overloads some amps that don't have volume on the input. Try it again if you can with the HD-800s plugged in directly. They are fine directly from the Hugo. Give it at least 10 minutes to warm up a bit first though. 

 
 
I think it's perfectly fine for Purrin to prefer other DAC's sound over Hugo and I'm sure he knows what he's doing as in not clipping the amp input.  From his comparison notes and posts (and the fact he prefers the original AK120 over the AK240) you can see his preference.  SearchofSub also seems to have similar preference that prefers warmth over details/neutrality.  I also have friends locally who prefers the X5 sound over Hugo saying Hugo.  Bottomline is that I learn how wide different preferences can varies.  Thought personally I would never be able to agree AK120 sounds better than AK240 or Hugo.  I believe there had been enough high praises for the Hugo (myself a accomplice) and it is good to also have folks like Purrin sharing a different views.

 
Totally agreed here. I was curious to find out how he had arrived at his impressions and wanted to make sure he hadn't hit on any of the weird things that came up with the Hugo that we knew about but he may not have.
 
Aug 3, 2014 at 11:52 PM Post #1,091 of 6,500
Purrin, I take it you're not a fan of ESS-based DACs? May I ask what do you think about CS-based DACs?
 
Aug 3, 2014 at 11:59 PM Post #1,093 of 6,500
  Purrin, I take it you're not a fan of ESS-based DACs? May I ask what do you think about CS-based DACs?

 
Taking into account that we all know that DACs are more than the chip, in general, I do not like Cirrus based DACs. Too boring or polite sounding. I do like the Lynx Hilo though and would take that for DSD over any SABRE. I tend to like AKMs for the modern chips. I don't think there's an AKM based DAC I've heard which I did not like.
 
Aug 4, 2014 at 12:12 AM Post #1,094 of 6,500
^Purrin, would you say the Gugnir/Bifrost USB 2's have the best cost/performance ratio in this thread/your experience?
 
Aug 4, 2014 at 1:12 AM Post #1,095 of 6,500
I think Bryston bda-2 might do the trick for me.. Chord does sound nice but eveything is just lit up and with MY speakers which are NOT laid back at all... it can get fatiging..

Purrin.. have you heard the bryston bda 2?

Did you also say you preffered Hugo over PS Audio Directstream? Just wanted to clarify...

P.S - souprknowa said the same thing to me in pm telling me What about Hugo lol

Sent from my SM-T230NU using Tapatalk
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top