Quote:
Originally Posted by Svperstar
Since I have a nice new tube amp on the way, I was thinking about how it would sound paired with Grados.
... The SR-60s ... SR-80s ... SR-225s ... MS-1s ...
<paraphrase: unfamiliar with the Grado sound signature> ...
How do Grados compare to the Senn 580s or Sony SA5000s? ...
|
From experience, I can say that the sound signature of the SR60 and SR225 is very similar. The overall sound QUALITY of the SR225 is sufficiently improved over the SR60 that it is well worth the price difference (IF you like the basic underlying signature). Also from experience, I can say that the SR60 improves modestly with the addition of an amp, the SR225 improves well enough to justify the cost of a $400 or so amp, IMO. Since you are buying the phones to test whether you like the Grado signature (which indicates starting toward the entry-level models) AND you are specifically wanting to pair them with an amp that would indicate the SR80 - entry-level and well-documented to improve well with an amp. At this point, you can increment your way up to an SR225 (if you want to): SR80's only cost a little less than the MS-1, which are only a tad less than the SR-125s, heck, if you're going to try the SR125, might as well go for the SR225... You know how it goes on this forum.
For my tastes, the VWAP-modded HD414 pads are THE way to fly with the SR60 and SR225 - compared with either the comfies or the bowls.
I own (and love) the SR60, SR225 and HD580. I'd compare the sound quality of the HD580 more to the SR225 than to the SR60. With the stock cable and grilles, the HD580 is about 3/4 of the way in SQ between the SR60 and the SR225. With HD600 or 650 grilles and a 650 cable, I'd say it's pretty equivalent SQ to the SR225, and with a Cardas replacement cable it surpasses the SQ of the SR225 by a noticeable and appreciable amount (well worth the cost of the Cardas cable, IMO). That was all overall SQ comparissons. As far as sonic attributes go (SR225 vs HD580), I hear quite a few similarities AND differences which make the two beautifully complementary. When I want the impact and "wail" factor that takes classic (or prog) rock or shoegaze to the next level, I use the SR225. Unlike many, I get very enjoyable soundstage and sonic imaging from my SR225. The HD580 I use for just about everything else - their additional clarity, spectral balance from one end of the spectrum to the other, gorgeous decay, and an additional measure of depth and spatial presentation make them ideal for all acoustic instrumental (folk to classical), female vocal, and every kind of electronica I've thrown at them, including trance. What's in common between the two?: 1) impact and texture (the HD580 can really hit you when the signal calls for it - laid back? - not to me), 2) soundstaging (oddly enough, from many of the comparissons I've read) - the HD580's do this better (larger and more precise) but the SR225 and HD580 present similar spatial impressions to my ear, 3) both give similar overall spectral impressions - the SR225 seems optimized for the "wail" factor (that lupine sense of howling into the night) of rock and the HD580 seems more overall balanced across the entire spectrum, but the 580 does NOT impress me as "laid back" or as a counterpoint to a Grado. The 580, to my ear, give a pretty similar overall spectral impression as the SR225. In fact, I can, and do, listen to rock, and enjoy it quite a lot, through the HD580. When I want to optimize the experience, however, I switch to the SR225. Even with the Cardas cable, the HD580 does NOT take rock to the level of the SR225.
Just my 2 cents (and probably not really worth even that) - but you asked, and here is what I have found by experience. YMMV.