myheadHz
New Head-Fier
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2014
- Posts
- 29
- Likes
- 42
Yes second this. Had a love/hate relationship with my L500 (Mk1) for over a year now.Without the port mod the L500 bass had no real slam or rumble. I did the blu tac mod myself following screenshots and it made an immediate difference in the bass.
When I first got it, it was quite dissappointing. Lovely staging width/depth, nice awesome clarity/detail, albeit slightly harsh and cold due to it's forwardness. Bass while detailed/fast, had completely anemic slam/body (typical estat described bass... you can hear it but it just feels like the life has been sucked out of it). Wanted to move it on within 2 days of having it tbh.
Then did a full seal blu-tac mod and low-end was suddenly all there, completely linear right down to as low as I have heard anything. Bass weight improved also, but the texture and technicality of it was some of the nicest I had heard to that date. However, while improved, was still lacking the body and slam a bit. Overall though it feels like this is what it should have been all along... but still missing something... while enjoyable, ended up confined to a box as it didn't warrant any headtime over my other stax.
Then I used L700 pads (also replaced yokes with metal Mk2 yokes, although not too sure on the difference that made), and this increased the attack and weight noticeably (although not as noticeable change as the blu-tac mod, which basically turned it into a different headphone, while keeping all the things that the L500 was good at in the first place). Still colder sounding than vintage lambdas, some of the harshness from the highs/mids got tamed also.
Suddenly it was a decent decendant of the vintage stax (albeit a new take on the sound, but with it's own wider/deeper presentation) and imo worthy of the 'lambda' title. Almost like a lambda version of the SR-X mk3, with technical/bodied bass and actual sound staging.
It still has the overall colder/forward sound associated with the L series, but much more digestable, not as fatiguing... and the bass (which should have been there all along) was finally there, full-bodied.
Recently got an LNC, and the bass body, texture and slam is wonderful with the LNC (I think more so than L500, although still in honeymoon period with the LNC), however the L500 is not far off and in fact feels faster and clearer in the low-end with rivaling slam and weight. Combined with it's forward mids/highs gives it a much more analytical presentation and makes it certainly feel much more mature and worthy increment to the 'vintage sound'.
LNC = smooth, organic, distant, weighty, warm...
L500 = crisp, analytical, wide, clarity, technical (but still weighty)...
Both have outstanding detail and resolution, I don't think either is technically superior, just different. On the surface though, the fowardness of the L500 makes it sound more analytical.
So it went from one of the biggest headphone dissappointments I have had (although with some slightly redeeming little flirts of magic)... to possibly my favourite lambda...
Also some EQ and loudness compensation work wonders on it and take it to the next level...
Last edited: