NoPants
1000+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Aug 14, 2006
- Posts
- 1,003
- Likes
- 98
O2 mk1
I just ordered the LLmk3.
I just ordered the LLmk3.
^X2. With the 007mkI you will find near zero fatigue, and it is probably one of the very few (the only one in my experience) that has the ability to be like that whilst excelling in detail extraction + impact. SR009 on the other hand has a bright sound sig, and depending on your personal tastes and amp/source, it could be induce fatigue.
O2 mk1
^X2. With the 007mkI you will find near zero fatigue, and it is probably one of the very few (the only one in my experience) that has the ability to be like that whilst excelling in detail extraction + impact. SR009 on the other hand has a bright sound sig, and depending on your personal tastes and amp/source, it could be induce fatigue.
After finally getting an electrostatic amp, a used Cavalli Liquid Lightning MKI, I'm finally able to listen to my 009s at my own place. After listening for most of this weekend and last night (after getting the amp on Friday), they're growing on me even more, and now definitely think that they're a cut above the HD-800s and any other top-of-the-line dynamic headphone I've owned or heard. As much as I love the HD-800s, I don't think they'll get very much listening anymore. The resolution and transparency they provide are simply astounding, and I can definitely tell that my DAC is now the limiting factor in my system. I think I now see what Currawong meant when he wrote "You'll never have a good enough source for them" in his review for the 009s.
I would suggest that you're leaving a lot of cards on the table with the SR-009s if you're using the LLMk1. I owned it and was not impressed to say the least. The SR-009s are so much more capable.
Thanks for the responses. On the technical side, I will be using a transformer 1st, probably an SRD7 with my power amp; is this sufficient?.
I'd have to second this, owned LLMK2 for a short period of time and was not impressed at all either.
The SR-007Mk1s are very special headphones and I enjoy them quite a bit, but I would classify them as a hint on the darker side and the SR-009s are pretty darn neutral (by my standards anyway) on my KGSSHV/BDA-2 setup.
I would suggest that you're leaving a lot of cards on the table with the SR-009s if you're using the LLMk1. I owned it and was not impressed to say the least. The SR-009s are so much more capable.
Well I'm still waiting on my BHSE, which I still plan on getting. I just wanted to get some sort of electrostatic amp that would allow me to listen to STAX headphones. I didn't want to get a STAX amp (such as the SRM-727II) because of all the negative things I've heard about them from people. So far I'm really liking the 009s with the LL, so it'll do for now at least. If I am leaving a lot of cards on the table that's probably a good thing because that means the 009s can sound even better than they do now (which is hard to imagine because they already sound so great).
Well I'm still waiting on my BHSE, which I still plan on getting. I just wanted to get some sort of electrostatic amp that would allow me to listen to STAX headphones. I didn't want to get a STAX amp (such as the SRM-727II) because of all the negative things I've heard about them from people. So far I'm really liking the 009s with the LL, so it'll do for now at least. If I am leaving a lot of cards on the table that's probably a good thing because that means the 009s can sound even better than they do now (which is hard to imagine because they already sound so great).