The Official Sony MDR-Z1R Flagship Headphone Thread (Live From IFA 2016)
Status
Not open for further replies.
Sep 5, 2016 at 11:38 PM Post #391 of 11,341
The reason is the Sony R10 mystique and hopes
that this will be "The One" that got away.  Also, this is
a big anniversary release.
 
Dear Sony,
 
If this headphone is not to my liking, it will be returned promptly.
 
Regards,
 
Drumonron
 
Sep 5, 2016 at 11:43 PM Post #392 of 11,341
 
Its not about how you validate your purchase. It's abouy how companies charge too much for a headphone.

If you knew what vendors paid for the Utopia you'd be shocked. An example...
The Airist Heron launched at 2k. It is now half the price MSRP and at 750 on Massdrop, Massdrop still gets some profit even at that price.

How much did it cost to make the Heron??? Prob 350 - 500 or less.

The Liquid carbon is very inexpensive to make. You know for sure this headphone is easily about 1/6th of the MSRP to make. R&D still would only bring it up to about 1/4th. I mean come on its metal stips paper and plastic. There are tons of things that cost way more to make and design. Video game consoles, Mopeds, speakers that sound even better for under a 1k a pair amd so forth.

For petes sake open a headphone... Its gotta be the cash cow of the audio world.. Cheap parts, cheap shipping, cheap materials....

We are all suckers and make a market for them. Yet as opposed to other hobbies it's easier to sell your gear. Look for deals etc and don't feel bad when you get a discount cause this crap is all overpriced plastic. Since the best cost so much, then buy away until something comes along to disrupt the trend. But everyone is greedy especially those buying this gear, myself included, so it will never change.
Hopefully a greedy person realizes that if you lower the price and make a product so good it can make other uber expensive gear sound obsolete then you make more money from selling more products.

As most Sony headphones, I doubt the Z1R will hold its MSRP for long so sit tight if you can. As for me... I'll keep being a sucker...

 
Much of my collection are deals: BF, warehouse deals, clearance, open-box, pre-order discounts, etc. Couldn't afford gear like my T1.2 otherwise.
 
Why is it that with each deal I feel like the price I paid is what the actual price should have been in the first place?
 
 
Sep 5, 2016 at 11:55 PM Post #394 of 11,341
   
I meant stock. Had a mostly stock Type R for ten years and even with no mods it was faster than some other modded cars. It was more expensive but easy to confirm the different parts (internal and external) along with increased performance.
 
With a headphone like the Utopia, at least we know how expensive beryllium (though toxic) is. We also understand some of the R&D costs for developing a new type of driver along with an entirely new headphone from scratch. I feel like the Utopia's $4K asking price is more justified than Sony's revision of an existing driver and design while asking 3-4x more.
 
Reaching for the unobtainable creates a lot of discussion. Have a feeling this thread would be much shorter if not for the price debate. Z1R is getting all the attention it needs before most can even hear it.
 

 
I can agree with this.
 
So for the Focal stuff has received glowing reviews, regardless of the cost. It even has people saying that the $4K spent on it might even be worth it.
 
Sony on the other hand has not really done anything groundbreaking lately and is charging a crapload of money for this new headphone. We are just going to have to wait until the headphones are more readily available and there are more impressions from people that can be trusted. All these CNET reviews mean squat to me.
 
Sep 6, 2016 at 1:05 AM Post #395 of 11,341
When did this thread become a pricing debate? What you do with your hard-earned money is your own business. Some people will buy expensive headphones, some will not. Everyone will have their own opinions on this matter. That’s just how it is. Deal with it.
 
If you think these headphones are overpriced, don’t buy them. Simple as that. This same exact topic was brought up when the HD800S were first announced with their pricing…
 
Sep 6, 2016 at 1:33 AM Post #396 of 11,341
omkwRiX.jpg

 
DwshaFT.jpg

 
t6xGuAw.jpg

 
Sep 6, 2016 at 2:14 AM Post #397 of 11,341
As most Sony headphones, I doubt the Z1R will hold its MSRP for long so sit tight if you can. As for me... I'll keep being a sucker...

Hard not to agree, unless it is the R10, Sony headphones do drop value rather quickly. Why that is the case I don't know. I really liked the MDR 1A, and the Z7. I didn't think the Z7 was as good at the lower frequencies as many here seem to think, but that is of course subjective. I had an absolute mint, maybe 3 months old 1A for sale here at $140 for about two months with no interest. I sold my Z7, again mint and very new for $440 Canadian. So based on what I see in the for sale forums here and elsewhere, as well as from first hand experience, I have to agree.
 
Perhaps this will be the one that breaks the trend and holds it value? I hope so as I do like Sony and it is great for the hobby that big players keep trying to innovate and be in this space.
 
Sep 6, 2016 at 2:14 AM Post #398 of 11,341
   
I can agree with this.
 
So for the Focal stuff has received glowing reviews, regardless of the cost. It even has people saying that the $4K spent on it might even be worth it.
 
Sony on the other hand has not really done anything groundbreaking lately and is charging a crapload of money for this new headphone. We are just going to have to wait until the headphones are more readily available and there are more impressions from people that can be trusted. All these CNET reviews mean squat to me.

I can see where you're coming from.  If anything though, from some discussions we had the development for this headphone has been going on for a very long time. It's not like it was conceived yesterday to be a member of the new pricing hype train.  EDIT (didn't finish the sentence): It is perhaps influenced, but there is still content there. 
 
Sep 6, 2016 at 3:33 AM Post #399 of 11,341
Sony MDR-Z1000 had been Sony's flagship for a while, but for these days flagship "must" cost over 2.000$ :wink:
 
Sep 6, 2016 at 4:33 AM Post #400 of 11,341
  Hard not to agree, unless it is the R10, Sony headphones do drop value rather quickly. Why that is the case I don't know. I really liked the MDR 1A, and the Z7. I didn't think the Z7 was as good at the lower frequencies as many here seem to think, but that is of course subjective. I had an absolute mint, maybe 3 months old 1A for sale here at $140 for about two months with no interest. I sold my Z7, again mint and very new for $440 Canadian. So based on what I see in the for sale forums here and elsewhere, as well as from first hand experience, I have to agree.
 
Perhaps this will be the one that breaks the trend and holds it value? I hope so as I do like Sony and it is great for the hobby that big players keep trying to innovate and be in this space.

 
There are more exceptions besides the R10. I paid 500 for my MDR-CD3000 in 2000 and sixteen years later, got multiple offers (3+) in the 1300 range. I can see fully working units hitting 1500 in the near future. That's +300%.
 
The Sony lemons might drop quickly, but when they manage to do something good, it can end with high demand/high prices, especially because sometimes the product lifecycle is really short and they discontinue stuff way early.
 
I have the feeling the MDR-Z1R has potential, but until I hear it, that's worth absolutely nothing. I would not have pre-ordered it if I couldn't return it.
 
 
  When did this thread become a pricing debate? What you do with your hard-earned money is your own business. Some people will buy expensive headphones, some will not. Everyone will have their own opinions on this matter. That’s just how it is. Deal with it.
 
If you think these headphones are overpriced, don’t buy them. Simple as that. This same exact topic was brought up when the HD800S were first announced with their pricing…


Interesting point, I somewhat agree.
We can still discuss value in the sense of what you get per each peanut spent, but knowing if a minute improvement here or there is worth the extra peanuts will depend on the buyer's preferences.
 
I find 2K EUR a disturbing amount to pay for any headphones, but that's mostly due to my profile, especially how often I use cans. The only reason I even consider this purchase is because I'm fine having just a single set of good headphones, and if I like it, I'll probably keep it for a long time (like I did with the MDR-CD3000).
 
2K for sixteen years of frequent enjoyment sounds a bit less painful. I have a harder time spending on products that are more vulnerable to obsolescence, for instance, a good TV or a good computer. Headphones are a very mature product that in some cases age well.
Some people prefer to have multiple models, and in that case I understand how you have to be even more picky when it comes to value for money.
 
The problem is if they're not good enough. That remains to be seen....uh, heard. I have to admit that those shenanigans with a half a kilogram gold player are not a good sign.
 
   
So for the Focal stuff has received glowing reviews, regardless of the cost. It even has people saying that the $4K spent on it might even be worth it.
 
Sony on the other hand has not really done anything groundbreaking lately and is charging a crapload of money for this new headphone. We are just going to have to wait until the headphones are more readily available and there are more impressions from people that can be trusted. All these CNET reviews mean squat to me.

 
I'm very curious with all this Focal hype and would like to check them out. Although we're talking of something costing twice as much and hitting prices that are considerably above average (I see the HD800S retailing for 1598e here, which isn't a huge distance to 2000e, especially if you take into account that a dedicated amp is essential, adding a minimum of 250 or so if you get something used or cheap.
So for this other fairly popular model, 1850e before you even start listening. A 150 eur gap, which you can even try to justify with the much nicer leather storage case. :p (assuming that thing is not PU)
 
But 4000 on the other hand... They have to be epically good in both sound and materials/construction for me to even think about thinking about it. Maybe they are, I don't know.
 
As for the Sony, at the moment there is no info, but it will be interesting to see comparisons with similarly priced models.
 
Sep 6, 2016 at 9:25 AM Post #401 of 11,341
  I know folks who take very pricey vacations, I do not.  My vacation
budget is on a nice headphone, it takes me to new places everyday
I put them on.  No regrets in any way whatsoever.  It's all a matter of
what is important to each individual.  I don't judge people when they 
purchase a very high priced car that will begin decomposing as soon as
they drive it off the lot.  I judge not those that drop 100 a week on a bar tab or
casino tab, etc.  So, please do not judge those that decide to try a nice headphone.
 
Welcome to head-fi, sorry about your wallet.

 
Nobody is judging anyone.
 
You got it, man!
It's like there are paid trolls here bashing everything that move. Meanwhile they brag about the 15,000 high end headphones they have to be outraged against Sony's "attempt" to extort money from them.
Ask anybody on the street to name a quality pair of headphones and if you had more than one in a thousand say something others than "Beats", you'd be on to something.
From my microscopic investment perspective there are either liars trolling these waters, or super-entitled knobs barfing on the wedding cake.
Can we just scream out, "Get a life!"?

 
Ask anybody on the street if they would spend $4000 on a set of headphones. One in a thousand might say yes. Or make that one in ten thousand.
 
Sep 6, 2016 at 9:28 AM Post #402 of 11,341
  Ask anybody on the street if they would spend $4000 on a set of headphones. One in a thousand might say yes. Or make that one in ten thousand.

 
Better not do that in the vicinity of IFA 2016, tho. :D
 
Sep 6, 2016 at 2:36 PM Post #404 of 11,341


 
 


I meant somebody is releasing a new flagship every 2nd month or so. Of course, if I stayed away from Head-Fi, I would be unaware of most of this.


 


HEY!


 





 


 


 


That's a wise way to operate.  Patience pays off. I'm a classic example of getting caught up in it but I did wait it out on the Pioneer Master 1 and got over it. Just takes practice
biggrin.gif
 




 


If you only knew what you're missing ... 
biggrin.gif
biggrin.gif
biggrin.gif

 
Sep 6, 2016 at 2:49 PM Post #405 of 11,341
For petes sake open a headphone... Its gotta be the cash cow of the audio world.. Cheap parts, cheap shipping, cheap materials
 
I think the cash cow of the audio world has to be phono cartridges. They are more out of control than high end headphones.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top