Bass on these is well extended, tight and controlled with excellent layering.
Not too full bodied though since it is on the leaner side of things.
Not too full bodied though since it is on the leaner side of things.
The Sundara is the 2020 Version?At this point I will throw in a quick comparison with the Hifiman Sundara:
Just like the HD 560s the Sundara are very detailed headphones. Open-back, too, but with planar-magnetic drivers instead. And with great detail retrieval, too!
Yet, in my opinion the Sundara are less detailed than the 560S and are a (tiny) bit more loose in the bass section. I am running the Sundara on the same player (Shanling M5s) on the balanced out with 300mW@32Ω. However, the Sundara are a lot more enjoyable and more comfortable to listen over long periods. Overall they are less bright than the HD 560S.
Haven’t asked Hifiman but since I ordered them only beginning of this year it should clearly be the latest revision.The Sundara is the 2020 Version?
I'm glad you're enjoying the HD560s, I think Sennheiser really got it right this time! Yes....Tube these babies, they absolutely love tubes! I've currently keep them on my Bifrost/Valhalla 2 stack permanently!Hello,
As a lover of my old (broken) Sennheiser RS130 RF headphones, I purchased the HD560S because I was not satisfied by my AKG 712 Pro and I must say that I am REALLY pleased with them. I really found the clarity I had with the RS130 and which I did not found with Sennheiser RS185 which are warmer (that is why I also skipped the 600 series, I had the intuition that the 560S would appeal me more).
Paired with Cayin HA-1A Mk2 tube amp at 65-150 ohm setting, they goes from (very) good headphones to heaven-sounding (it adds a bit more presence in basses and a feeling of reverb). It also makes them a bit less "dry". As a vocal lover, they sound just right...and in fact perfect so that I do not even see what I could improve. The funny thing is that these headphones are very cheap... It seems that I just like the "simply flat without unecessary refinment" of cheap headphones.
I still use my AKG for orchestral music (like videogames) since I love the details they provide on these (HD560S are less good in this department, but because I almost only hear music with vocals, i.e. mostly pop they are by far my favorite)
I somewhat considered HD569 to use at work, do they have the same sound character than HD560S ? If I had closed-back headphones with a sound close to these, I would be very happy.
I'm glad you're enjoying the HD560s, I think Sennheiser really got it right this time! Yes....Tube these babies, they absolutely love tubes! I've currently keep them on my Bifrost/Valhalla 2 stack permanently!
A closed back variant with all the same attributes would be an instant buy for me!
HD569 - By the Godfather of Headphone Gurus.
They really do look like twin's - HD560s / HD569
Enjoy!
A month in and these are the headphones for me. They sound clear and covers the whole frequency range the way I like it. Gaming and movies have been a treat on it and most of all comfort is top notch. Even after purchasing an Ananda I just like how the midrange is being portrayed in these headphones and I switch between the two frequently. Plus it's all black, my favorite color. Sennheiser did good on these.
The Anandas are definitely a step up technically wise, with better bass extension and volume, a more precise imaging, and also better details. I use them with particularly well recorded and when I'm watching movies. The HD 560S have more presence in the mid range, so music with lots of acoustic material on it and voices in particular are times when I switch to it. Podcasts are also where I use the HD 560s more with. I think as far as the soundstage goes, they are both quite equal, only the Anandas give a better sense of up vs down, compared to the HD 560s. I play games like Battlefield V with its Binaural audio mode and I seem to hear footsteps the same with either headphones. Just that I can hear whatever that is above or below me slightly clearer with the Anandas, so planes that zoom above me and people running around trenches below make me look up or down respectively more readily with the Anandas than I do with the HD 560s.Also for me they seem to be more balanced after more burn in time. So definitely required!
Currently I am running the 560S on an Hiby R3 Pro Saber on balanced out. Treble is no longer an issue, might be the player though.
Don’t have the Ananda but thought of getting them. Would you mind providing some more detailed comparison?
I have the Hifiman Edition X ( OG) and can say the 560s and Edition X are both par as one of my favorite out of the lot! The midrange is where both just get right for me, I often think of the Edition X as a Super HD600. I will say, imho, the HD560s images better than the Edition X. I've recently upgraded my Edition X earpads to full Pleather and that has helped in both imaging and bass response but I still believe the 560s hold it's own.The Anandas are definitely a step up technically wise, with better bass extension and volume, a more precise imaging, and also better details. I use them with particularly well recorded and when I'm watching movies. The HD 560S have more presence in the mid range, so music with lots of acoustic material on it and voices in particular are times when I switch to it. Podcasts are also where I use the HD 560s more with. I think as far as the soundstage goes, they are both quite equal, only the Anandas give a better sense of up vs down, compared to the HD 560s. I play games like Battlefield V with its Binaural audio mode and I seem to hear footsteps the same with either headphones. Just that I can hear whatever that is above or below me slightly clearer with the Anandas, so planes that zoom above me and people running around trenches below make me look up or down respectively more readily with the Anandas than I do with the HD 560s.