Wmcmanus
President treasurer secretary and sole member of the Cayman Islands Head-Fi Club.
- Joined
- Nov 29, 2002
- Posts
- 11,830
- Likes
- 27
This thread is intended to be a parody on the state of nature of our discussions here at Head-Fi. No offense intended to anyone, it's just that by the very nature of the law of large numbers there will always be diverging opinions. We all hear differently and we all need to be heard (in terms of arguing that X is better than Y). Heck, some of us haven't heard anything but still have an opinion on the matter! But in this thread, that's Ok!!!
It should be a fun game. I hope you'll all play along. I'll start by making a statement about what I believe are the "best" headphones to me, but I won't tell you how I've come to this conclusion or what I mean by "best"; it's just what I believe.
Anyone is then free to discredit what I've had to say simply by stating your own conclusion (so long as you believe it) without in any way providing even a morsel of support for your conclusion. Of course, if you agree with me you can just say, "I agree". Hang in there, because I promise you this will be fun!
The only requirement that is that you must be "serious" in the sense that you should really believe that what you're posting is true, at least to you. It doesn't matter how you've arrived at this belief. Your conclusions could have been derived as a result of your own listening experiences, or they could be based n what you're read here at Head-Fi, or what you've heard others say, etc.
Ok, so the game itself is quite simple. I'll start with this:
"The HE90s are the best headphones."
You can then say, "I agree." Or you can say, "I think the R10s are better" (or whatever pair of headphones you believe are better than the HE90s).
The next person can then agree with you that the R10s are the "best" headphones (i.e., since they are "better" than what I think is the "best", they must themselves be the "best"). Or that person can say, "I think the K1000s are better" (making them, or whatever other pair that person chooses as the best to become the new best, thus replacing the R10 at the top slot).
Once we have a new best, that's the pair of headphones that the next person needs to make his or her comparison against. So if we go from the HE90 to R10 to K1000, then next person has to agree or disagree with the K1000 being the best. If that person disagrees, then he or she should state what is best (which could take us back to the HE90 but by definition not back to the R10, at least not on that round). Get it?
After several pages of posts, I'll explain my theory, and then maybe open the thread up to a discussion about what this exercise has taught us (if anything). But for now, please don't explain why you think the way that you do, just state your beliefs and let the next person state his or hers without arguing back and forth.
It should be a fun game. I hope you'll all play along. I'll start by making a statement about what I believe are the "best" headphones to me, but I won't tell you how I've come to this conclusion or what I mean by "best"; it's just what I believe.
Anyone is then free to discredit what I've had to say simply by stating your own conclusion (so long as you believe it) without in any way providing even a morsel of support for your conclusion. Of course, if you agree with me you can just say, "I agree". Hang in there, because I promise you this will be fun!
The only requirement that is that you must be "serious" in the sense that you should really believe that what you're posting is true, at least to you. It doesn't matter how you've arrived at this belief. Your conclusions could have been derived as a result of your own listening experiences, or they could be based n what you're read here at Head-Fi, or what you've heard others say, etc.
Ok, so the game itself is quite simple. I'll start with this:
"The HE90s are the best headphones."
You can then say, "I agree." Or you can say, "I think the R10s are better" (or whatever pair of headphones you believe are better than the HE90s).
The next person can then agree with you that the R10s are the "best" headphones (i.e., since they are "better" than what I think is the "best", they must themselves be the "best"). Or that person can say, "I think the K1000s are better" (making them, or whatever other pair that person chooses as the best to become the new best, thus replacing the R10 at the top slot).
Once we have a new best, that's the pair of headphones that the next person needs to make his or her comparison against. So if we go from the HE90 to R10 to K1000, then next person has to agree or disagree with the K1000 being the best. If that person disagrees, then he or she should state what is best (which could take us back to the HE90 but by definition not back to the R10, at least not on that round). Get it?
After several pages of posts, I'll explain my theory, and then maybe open the thread up to a discussion about what this exercise has taught us (if anything). But for now, please don't explain why you think the way that you do, just state your beliefs and let the next person state his or hers without arguing back and forth.