Hi Brooko,
First, thanks for replying my question. I'm not confused about the differences in hardware features, like the use as a USB DAC and # of micro-sd slots, I was confused about the differences in SQ as when I auditioned the X1 and X5 last year, the tonality of the two sounded different to me, thus I was kind of puzzled why you mention that the tonality is similar, just different in the level of refinement. Perhaps my listening experiences isn't sufficient to make an accurate assessment of what is same tonality and what is different tonality, but I did feel two difference characters of music portrayed by the X5 and the X1.
Nevertheless, I just found out from a friend that a local audiophile shop has got demo units of the X3ii, I don't know how they have gotten units since it isn't officially launched yet, probably they asked Fiio for demo units and collect pre-orders. So I will be heading down on Tuesday to have an audition, excited for it!
No problems. Again - levels of overall differences will vary wildly between people. I'd like to think that I don't try to over-exaggerate what I hear, so for me when differences are small, that's the way I call them. I'm not a "night and day" kind of guy
Here's how I described the X5 vs X1 when I
reviewed the X1:
The X1 (to my imperfect ears) is quite a neutral sounding DAP – with a slight touch of warmth, very similar to the X5. Where the X1 differs is that it has a very slightly thicker, or fuller overall sound compared to the X5 – the X5 sounds comparatively cleaner, instruments sound more precise, with more space. The differences are there – but they are not huge – but to me they are noticeable. This can give the X1 the impression that the mid-range might be ever so slightly forward, but with the volume matching and constant back and forth during testing, I think that’s just an impression. I personally think what I’m hearing is the X5’s blacker background, and greater refinement – it’s simply more effortless in its presentation.
When I critically compare side-by-side, I always make sure that:
- Volume is matched
- Same tracks are used (same master, same format, essentially same files)
- No EQ
- Same earphones
- Both fast switching, and also longer sessions with each
I also make sure that I give solo time to each DAP (ie at least 2-3 days to a single DAP) to "brain-burn" the signature - rather than faster switching from the start. I find that this gives me greater appreciation of similarities ...... and also differences.
I've also been lucky in that I've had
a lot of quality time with both DAPs. FWIW my opinion on the two remains the same (I redid the comparison this morning just to be sure).
Tonally the X1 and X5 are similar - but the X5 does have a more refined, cleaner, smoother presentation - and it is quite noticeable. The X1 sounds thicker comparatively, and slightly warmer. Again for me - the X5 is my preferred presentation.
Comparing all 3 directly - my impression of SQ would go:
X1 < < < X3ii < < < X5
I'd say the X3ii sits squarely between the X1 and X5 as far as levels of refinement go. There is a bigger difference between X1 and X5 (naturally), and smaller cumulative differences between X1 to X3ii and X3ii to X5.
Hopefully when you get to demo the X3ii, you can spend a couple of hours with it - and can volume match properly when you do your A/Bs.