So one of my testing regimens is to start off with the 'new guy' at the start of my nightly multi-hour listening sessions.
Late at night is the 1st time I get to 'listen' (with focused attention) all day, and other than the desktop horn speakers for 'background' music, this is my uninterrupted 'free' time to drill down into the differences or evaluate changes etc.
And so by starting out with the new guy I give it a chance to 'make an impression' on me.
IOW do I start danc'n in my chair, playing air piano, yank the lanyard on that cannon, listen to a tube amp give it's all, as it melts down thanks to Daft Punk, etc?
Which is often the case, or so it seems.
But then I swap back to 'the old standard' and listen to the differences.
And so I hear…
What is missing
What is 'added'
What 'sticks out'
Which soundstage is 'better'
Can I understand ALL the lyrics?
The list goes on, (see my sig line for my words in
BOLD)
And what I heard tonight is a fairly thick veil was noticed on the 'new guy' and it screwed with the acoustic space of every track I listened to, regardless of the type or nature of the music.
It sorta sounds like a 'tunnel effect' where the music is at the other end of an acoustic space that is constricted instead of it 'filling the available space'.
It wasn't unpleasant nor off-putting, it just wasn't as REAL, it didn't sound like I was engrossed in listening to music, rather I was listening to a decent hifi system.
I can see why some would like this as it doesn't do any thing wrong, but at the expense of NOT doing some things right.
And if those 'right things' are not on your list of desirable acoustic attributes, well then it’s a win-win-win all the way around.
And of course it could be that my setup isn't an ideal match for these LCD's.
But one thing seems abundantly clear, the signal being fed to them is capable of sublime detail and presence, especially when I yank on that lanyard…
JJ
