ardgedee
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2010
- Posts
- 3,774
- Likes
- 508
So this purchase partly might be Apple's bid to become more Plebian as its mass consumer appeal falters for the segment Cupertino rose to the top with ---- music. Apple likely has something up its sleeves regarding the future of music hardware, whether it be hearables, high-resolution, wireless, or all three and more. Purchasing the most recognizable headphone brand in the world enables them to dictate the direction of the whole of the headphone market (for better or for worse --- let's just say better for now, because, Apple).
If Apple was to try and dictate the future of the headphone industry they won't do it with Beats. Substance will always outlive hype and the next flavor of the month.
My view is Iovine brings something Apple sorely needs, content and insider knowledge of the music and, generally speaking, the media industry. They need him to keep from becoming known as the blundering dinosaur that the next generations dad and mom used to rave about. I really don't think this move is going to work though. both sides are so alien to one another when you consider how different the companies cultures are.
I think DF has it. This is as much or more a talent acquisition (Iovine) as it is a property acquisition (Beats).
Iovine is not just the head man of Beats. Before that he was the founder of Interscope records, which means he's one handshake away from a considerable range of talents and industry people, and was the boss over many of them. Apple now has on their side one of the most scary powerful guys in the entertainment industry since Steve Jobs (Pixar and freakin' Disney) left. Except that Iovine's commitment to Apple is not going to be as total as Jobs' was. Despite his pricetag. We'll see. Anyway.
This indicates to me Apple has some kind of intentions to dig deeper into the media distribution chain. Exactly where, I dunno. If anything it indicates Apple is kind of obsessively focusing on the music industry when their competitors (Netflix, Amazon) are branching into original TV content. But Apple might also be considering TV an arena they wouldn't be able to get good leverage into, or an unnecessary fragmenting of their resources. The Apple TV is a profitable product for them even while they continue to underplay its role in their product lineup, which would be a sign they have bigger plans and also that they aren't ready to pull off those bigger plans.
Given as the Beats deal had been rumored for a while now (and probably instigated by a deliberate leak by Iovine's staff) and only closed this week, there was probably an up-to-the-wire acquisition deadline of this weekend so that Apple has a new venture announcement to make at the WWDC event next Monday. We'll see.