DigitalFreak
镇老鹰
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2011
- Posts
- 7,076
- Likes
- 774
Don't you think you guys may be over thinking all this? I've never played the game and I only know what I've read about it on here but here's my 2 cents on the subject. In my mind before there can be multiple timelines there has to be a starting point somewhere along 1 key timeline where everything branches from. Maybe the Booker in the game is the original Booker whose actions threw the normal timeline into a flux which caused a branching of infinite timelines. Elizabeth could be the key catalyst to shut down the infinite timelines and restore balance therefore the main catalyst which time flows around wouldn't so much be Booker but would be the original Elizabeth in the original timeline which infinite timelines branch from. Yes there are other Elizabeth's and Booker's out there in the infinite timelines but whether they be evil or not could possibly have no bearing. For instance, what one timeline would deem evil and wicked another timeline would deem pure and good. Therefore whether we or any of the characters in the game would consider Elizabeth, or Booker for that matter, as good or evil would have no bearing on the final outcome or how the various characters in the various timelines choose to interact with one another and what the end result must be to restore balance. The fact the other Booker's and other Elizabeth's would cease to exist would probably also have no bearing because of the fact the other entities in other timelines could believe the elimination of their timelines as only a rejoining of their true selves back into the starting timeline.
I don't know, makes sense to me. An here I thought I had left my geeky gamer side behind to die in the late 90's.
I don't know, makes sense to me. An here I thought I had left my geeky gamer side behind to die in the late 90's.