maniacal71
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Sep 11, 2011
- Posts
- 276
- Likes
- 36
The DT48 are in a different class altogether. Once you know why, you know.
The DT48 are in a different class altogether. Once you know why, you know.
Hi Guys,
I already have a pair of bayerdinamic T1, which I like (but don't love!)!!
I would like to try a pair of dt48 200 ohm (I'he a nice tube amp for high impedance). Please can someone tell me how it sounds with classic music making a comparison with the t1?
Thanks a lot!!
Marco
Hi Guys,
I already have a pair of bayerdinamic T1, which I like (but don't love!)!!
I would like to try a pair of dt48 200 ohm (I'he a nice tube amp for high impedance). Please can someone tell me how it sounds with classic music making a comparison with the t1?
Thanks a lot!!
Marco
If your making music and monitoring recordings, the DT48 is the obvious choice for its isolation and no glamour type sound. They work amazing as reference monitors.
But for translating mixes, you will want to use speakers such as the NS10 or Auratone 5C. What you hear in headphones simply won't sound the same on speakers.
For normal music listening, the T1 will sound better to most people. Dont expect the DT48 to impress you in the same sense that the T1 does. Different design goals...
The DT48 was made for monitoring vocals, like field recording, movies, radio, and audio interviews...some studio engineers used them as well in the 70's. You can get better hps for monitoring in the studio today, the DT's have some roll-off on both sides this why is hard to use them as studio reference monitor. But DT's are still one of the best for vocals.
What roll offs?? I compare them to my speakers and they seem to sound similar less the sub 20hz vibes. Fitting the new E pads, the treble is much better. Running from a good matching amp, does it wonders. Some thing to ponder as well, they were made for audiometric tests, so why would they make one with roll offs??
For audiometric testing maybe it's not so important to have accurate sub 50hz.or above 10khz. But I'm referring to the dt48E which was not the model designed for audiometric testing....that was the 'A', I think. I compared my dt48E to the k240DF, which is no bass monster, and the DT48 has had less lower bass than the DF....and way less bass overall than the hd580. Could very well be the amp, but most listeners, even those with very good amps, have noticed bass roll off below 60hz or so with the 'E'.
It would be interesting to put this "bass roll off" in context and say "compared to...".
IMO, it depends a lot on subjective references of each individuals. If you compare the bass response of the DT48 to what you perceive during an unamplified acoustic performance, you might find there is not that much difference. Remember the DT48 was designed some 70 years ago... I would bet acoustic music is all people had as subjective reference at that time. This has changed a lot.