Antistase
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Jun 13, 2009
- Posts
- 126
- Likes
- 10
Shamu,
Drosera report is about the 25 ohm DT48. Which impedance is yours?
A
Drosera report is about the 25 ohm DT48. Which impedance is yours?
A
Originally Posted by shamu144 /img/forum/go_quote.gif Thanks Drosera for sharing your impressions. I'll definitely add my grain of salt and emphasize that my findings are very different from yours, which is why I think it is probably wise to recommend people trying by themselves before final judgment The one thing I agree with you is the very noticeable effect volume-wise when switching from 0 ohms to 120 ohms. On the Lavry, I must adjust the volume from 15/20 up to 30/35 on par now with my K501... Nothing to worry about though. Other than that, I have done some more comparisons with the same consistant results. However, the differences for me are indeed subtles between both output (well in my case, with or without adapter). Mids and especially vocals become better defined with a better separation and sligthly less forward sounding. You can just identify more easily different voices in a choir or more clearly "see" the contour of Diana Krall's voice for example. Switching back to the 0 ohms output and you irremediably lose resolution and control in the mids. Highs have now a more noticeable presence and what seem to me a sligtly better extension, though this could as well be the result of the less forward mids which allow a better integration of all frequencies. As for bass, there is without a doubt more of it, and it comes together with a better impact, weight and control (obvious on John Clayton's solo on East of the Sun - Diana Krall Live in Paris), which is certainly not something DT48 owner would complain about. I am of course unable to provide any technical explanations to support my findings, but I also find striking the fact that the DT48E is the only current headphone in production for which Beyer specifically recommends a nominal source impedance of 120 ohms, unlike the DT880/DT770/DT250/DT150/etc.... |
Originally Posted by shamu144 /img/forum/go_quote.gif The one thing I agree with you is the very noticeable effect volume-wise when switching from 0 ohms to 120 ohms. On the Lavry, I must adjust the volume from 15/20 up to 30/35 on par now with my K501... Nothing to worry about though. |
Originally Posted by shamu144 /img/forum/go_quote.gif Thanks Drosera for sharing your impressions. I'll definitely add my grain of salt and emphasize that my findings are very different from yours, which is why I think it is probably wise to recommend people trying by themselves before final judgment |
Originally Posted by H-ermes /img/forum/go_quote.gif Hello everybody, I've bought an old DT 48e (20 ohm version). I've received it Saturday and I'm listening to it since. My pads are mode with black PVC. I'm deeply sorry, because I did not read the 98 pages of this thread. So excuse me, if the answers to my questions were already given. |
Originally Posted by H-ermes /img/forum/go_quote.gif 1. What is, for you, the best pads to be used with this headphone ? Where can I buy them (I'm from France) ? |
Originally Posted by H-ermes /img/forum/go_quote.gif 2. After a 4 hours listening sessions, I see water / sweat inside the headphone. Is it normal ? What should I do in order to avoid it ? |
Originally Posted by Slash47 /img/forum/go_quote.gif (Sorry, I didn't read much of the previous 99 pages. Only the first few |
Originally Posted by Slash47 /img/forum/go_quote.gif I ordered some T1's, but I'd like something affordable and durable on the side for a different flavor every now and again. It would be great if this 'phone would excel at baroque music. I have a lot of very good recordings, both on vinyl and on cd. I don't care about bass too much with headphones, as long as it isn't boomy which I don't think I need to worry about here After some research I'm considering the DT48E 25Ohm and a used K501, but I'd prefer a new can so the DT48 would be better in that respect. Good idea? Any other suggestions? |
Originally Posted by Drosera /img/forum/go_quote.gif Pfff, what is it with people and their unwillingness to spend some time reading!? ... Of course, you actually should just get both, because that is the proper head-fi way. |
Originally Posted by Slash47 /img/forum/go_quote.gif I just needed that final push towards wasting my money. |
Originally Posted by Slash47 /img/forum/go_quote.gif (And you should definitely try the T1. Compared to the DT880 it's much more lively and vibrant without sacrificing anything at all. It's great and I can't wait to have my own!) |
Originally Posted by H-ermes /img/forum/go_quote.gif @Drosera Thanks for your answer. I really appreciate the neutrality of this headphone. I am a lucky owner of a GS 1000 from Grado and I really both of the sound. What i like with this headphone is the absolute restitution of everything. Everything is here, it's a chirurgical headphone. I'm not a pro. When I bought it, I was looking for a very neutral closed headphone and for that, I'm not disappointed. Do you compare DT 48 with DT 100 or DT 150 ? What were your conclusions ? H. |
Originally Posted by Drosera /img/forum/go_quote.gif Pfff, what is it with people and their unwillingness to spend some time reading!? While a DT48E would be an excellent choice for baroque, in my opinion, because I personally find it especially well suited to smaller scale repertoire, I don't know if in this case it would be dissimilar enough to the T1 to be what you're looking for. Okay, I haven't actually heard the T1 yet (it's definitely at the top of my shopping list though), but other Beyerdynamic 'phones like the DT880 seem to share at least that dry and neutralish signature that typifies the DT48. Of course, the fact that it's closed vs. the open T1 will already give it a different character. But if you really want something that imparts a rather different flavour on your music the K501 might be the more interesting choice. Actually, I would consider getting its predecessor, the K500, since it's far easier to get (at least, on German eBay) and has the superior pads (both acoustically and comfort-wise). Then again, the K501 seems to have the slight edge in detail. Both are excellent choices for this particular kind of music, it's hard to think of any other headphones that I would recommend alongside them. I think it's simply a matter if you value neutrality above all (DT-48) or would like some of that slightly and very attractively coloured vintage AKG sound. Of course, you actually should just get both, because that is the proper head-fi way. |
Originally Posted by Slash47 /img/forum/go_quote.gif I might, thanks. And I know what you mean about reading stuff, I will. To tell you the truth I read plenty of posts, I just needed that final push towards wasting my money. (And you should definitely try the T1. Compared to the DT880 it's much more lively and vibrant without sacrificing anything at all. It's great and I can't wait to have my own!) |
Originally Posted by Slash47 /img/forum/go_quote.gif I ordered some T1's, but I'd like something affordable and durable on the side for a different flavor every now and again. It would be great if this 'phone would excel at baroque music. I have a lot of very good recordings, both on vinyl and on cd. I don't care about bass too much with headphones, as long as it isn't boomy which I don't think I need to worry about here After some research I'm considering the DT48E 25Ohm and a used K501, but I'd prefer a new can so the DT48 would be better in that respect. Good idea? Any other suggestions? I'm also buying a new amp, so that doesn't really play into this decision. (Sorry, I didn't read much of the previous 99 pages. Only the first few |
Originally Posted by H-ermes /img/forum/go_quote.gif Do you compare DT 48 with DT 100 or DT 150 ? What were your conclusions ? |
Originally Posted by kool bubba ice /img/forum/go_quote.gif Do you think the DT48 mid range sounds dry? |
Dry - Lack of reverberation or delay as produced by a damped environment. May comes across as fine grained and lean. Opposite of Wet. |