johnnylexus
500+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Oct 4, 2001
- Posts
- 709
- Likes
- 10
The Stones did some awesome rock 'n roll in the day.... but,
The Beatles redefined rock/pop music.
The Beatles redefined rock/pop music.
Originally Posted by Arainach /img/forum/go_quote.gif If the Stones are the blueprint for what's so great in rock, the Beatles are the blueprint for what's so great in modern music period. ... |
Originally Posted by milkweg /img/forum/go_quote.gif Beatles are for sandal wearing losers. |
Originally Posted by Arainach /img/forum/go_quote.gif If the Stones are the blueprint for what's so great in rock, the Beatles are the blueprint for what's so great in modern music period. They transcend genres, eras, and everything to be the band that everyone is compared to and no one is equal to. |
Originally Posted by milkweg /img/forum/go_quote.gif Beatles are for sandal wearing losers. |
Originally Posted by tru blu /img/forum/go_quote.gif Nice flip of my original post, but here's a question: Besides rock, what would be another genre of "modern (read: post-'60s) music" that the Beatles influenced more than the Stones? Just curious… |
Originally Posted by Arainach /img/forum/go_quote.gif They pioneered a large number of recording and mastering techniques that are used in essentially every album released today, for starters. |
Originally Posted by ingwe /img/forum/go_quote.gif So, you like Beatles. ![]() |
Originally Posted by DLeeWebb /img/forum/go_quote.gif Rightly or wrongly, I have always thought of The Beatles and The Rolling Stones being the two sides of the British Rock n' Roll coin. Light v. Dark, Smooth v. Rough, Sophisticated v. "Crude" etc. I like them both and recognize the influence of both, but if I had to pick one I would go with The Stones... |