flymetothemoon
Headphoneus Supremus
Hello i thing that i am guilty for the jump of the price, i sent yesterday an email to mr Altmann asking if the price of tera was for real (6720 €!!!!!!!!!) And he answered that it was real and that will be increased , I told him that he is free to do what he wants and i respect that but for who says that have a passion so great for music,is giving up to hype and for money ,...the answer for him ends in "**** you"...what a caracter))
You don't need to be guilty as even at 6720 €, you'll find no justification to get the device as I am a former owner of Tera and it was let go with good reasons...humbled by another device that costed much less than 6720 €...the AK240...to which I'm still using as my only DAP.
I've sold the Tera at cost, to which I've paid 890 € with just a tad over 2 years of ownership. I've made extensive comparisons between the two (using Tralucent Ref.1/Uber as reference IEMs) before decision was made which one has to let go.
I can understand why fellow headfiers addicted to the Tera as it has an unique sound signature appeals to some. For me, I'm looking for truthfulness from the recordings and this is the area that Tera falls short of.
My humble advice is...we need to keep a clear head as we are not "investing" into valuables (like time pieces & certain jewellery) and it is one digital product and its value will diminish over time when displaced by newer technologies (like my Leica M-P240, but not necessarily the Leica lenses). This principle has been reflected by your attention in reviewing what level of resolution that one digital music player can accommodate as the resolution of the source has been increased dramatically over the last few years. Be wise.
You might challenge my knowledge on analogue sound but below is my credentials (my 30 years old system that I'm about to put it back together)...