Hirsch
Why is there a chaplain standing over his wallet?
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2001
- Posts
- 7,826
- Likes
- 72
The TDS passive audiophile is a black box, roughly six inches square and two inches high (I didn't measure), with a single switch on the front that engages the unit, and a single set of inputs and output in the rear. In theory, it restores harmonics of the live performance that are lost in the recording process. Whatever. It claims to be a passive inductor. Hmmm...someone dissected one of the MIT network boxes once, and found an inductor circuit. Does this unit use a similar technology to the MIT/Transparent passive networks? I have no idea, but the idea had me curious. I bought a used TDS, and hooked it between my DAC and MF X-Can v2...then let everything burn in as I got used to listening to it. The bypass switch is nice, as it's possible to listen with and without the unit, without having to move wires.
The first thing you notice is gain...about 3 db is claimed. My DAC is an ART DI/O, which has way too much gain to start with, but the X-Can didn't really care, and I got better at very small movements of the volume control. (I also tried this unit with a Theta Chroma 396, but most of my listening is through the DI/O). Rest of system: Senn HD-600 cans, Homegrown Audio Silver Lace interconnects, Elco DC-32 digital interconnects, Rotel 955 CDP, Theta TLC, Monster HTS-2000 power conditioner.
At first, with the unit on, the volume at which things sounded tonally correct was too high, IMO, for headphones. I found that I was using the amp louder than I liked, not because I wanted more volume, but because the music sounded wrong at my usual listening levels. This would have made the TDS a poor choice for headphone use, and could have been a risk to the ears. However, the effect was only present during initial burn-in, and disappeared within a couple of days, as volume levels went back to normal.
So what does it do? To tell the truth, I'm not sure. However, I can't take it out of the system. With the TDS in place, everything seems more vivid. Part of me is wondering if some kind of dynamic range enhancement is going on. If so, it's not bad.
Instruments take on a much more three dimensional aspect. If I use the bypass mode, and volume match to the previous level, everything sounds relatively flat and lifeless. The instruments seem smeared. With the TDS on, in the opening cut to Laurie Anderson's "Big Science", when David van Tiegham's drum beats snap. You can feel the percussive effect, and the later decay. With the TDS off, the drum beat is present, but the impact is reduced. Anderson's voice is very focussed and dynamic with the TDS present. Turn it off, and her voice seems to lose coherence. Instead of standing out vividly, it blends back into the mix. These effects are not subtle.
The TDS seems to bring out a lot of detail in recordings. This is not always good. Eva Cassidy's "Time after Time" is a wonderful CD, but not particularly well recorded. With the TDS on, Eva's voice becomes even more vivid, and there is greater presence. However, you can also hear all of the flaws in the recording process...studio noise is also enhanced, and is distracting when it occurs. Problematical, but IMO the problem is the recording, not the TDS. The TDS seems to make everything more vivid, and brings out detail you just didn't know was there. There may be a slight reduction of this effect at the highest and lowest frequencies, but I'm not certain.
If you can find one of these used, I'd recommend it highly. I normally don't like the concept of signal processors, but this one is doing some very nice things. I find my headphone system much harder to listen to when I use the bypass. As it is, this is rapidly becoming a permanent fixture in my system.
I don't really know what it does, but I like it!
The first thing you notice is gain...about 3 db is claimed. My DAC is an ART DI/O, which has way too much gain to start with, but the X-Can didn't really care, and I got better at very small movements of the volume control. (I also tried this unit with a Theta Chroma 396, but most of my listening is through the DI/O). Rest of system: Senn HD-600 cans, Homegrown Audio Silver Lace interconnects, Elco DC-32 digital interconnects, Rotel 955 CDP, Theta TLC, Monster HTS-2000 power conditioner.
At first, with the unit on, the volume at which things sounded tonally correct was too high, IMO, for headphones. I found that I was using the amp louder than I liked, not because I wanted more volume, but because the music sounded wrong at my usual listening levels. This would have made the TDS a poor choice for headphone use, and could have been a risk to the ears. However, the effect was only present during initial burn-in, and disappeared within a couple of days, as volume levels went back to normal.
So what does it do? To tell the truth, I'm not sure. However, I can't take it out of the system. With the TDS in place, everything seems more vivid. Part of me is wondering if some kind of dynamic range enhancement is going on. If so, it's not bad.
Instruments take on a much more three dimensional aspect. If I use the bypass mode, and volume match to the previous level, everything sounds relatively flat and lifeless. The instruments seem smeared. With the TDS on, in the opening cut to Laurie Anderson's "Big Science", when David van Tiegham's drum beats snap. You can feel the percussive effect, and the later decay. With the TDS off, the drum beat is present, but the impact is reduced. Anderson's voice is very focussed and dynamic with the TDS present. Turn it off, and her voice seems to lose coherence. Instead of standing out vividly, it blends back into the mix. These effects are not subtle.
The TDS seems to bring out a lot of detail in recordings. This is not always good. Eva Cassidy's "Time after Time" is a wonderful CD, but not particularly well recorded. With the TDS on, Eva's voice becomes even more vivid, and there is greater presence. However, you can also hear all of the flaws in the recording process...studio noise is also enhanced, and is distracting when it occurs. Problematical, but IMO the problem is the recording, not the TDS. The TDS seems to make everything more vivid, and brings out detail you just didn't know was there. There may be a slight reduction of this effect at the highest and lowest frequencies, but I'm not certain.
If you can find one of these used, I'd recommend it highly. I normally don't like the concept of signal processors, but this one is doing some very nice things. I find my headphone system much harder to listen to when I use the bypass. As it is, this is rapidly becoming a permanent fixture in my system.
I don't really know what it does, but I like it!