d marc0
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2012
- Posts
- 2,443
- Likes
- 2,300
Okay guys! i've been listening to the Altone 350 for a couple of days now and here's my early impressions:
The Altone 350 reminds me more of the H200 than H300... the H300 to me had more sub bass rumble, slam and punch, the mids is excellent for female vocals, unfortunately the treble was just too hot. From memory, the H300 is still the best T-PEOS IEM in bass performance: excellent depth due to layering and texture plus control is great for a bass heavy tuning.
The Altone 350's bass quantity reminded me of the H200 but unfortunately quality is not as good IMHO. The H200 bass although not as layered as the H300, was well controlled and had excellent speed - the best performer for heavy metal I've heard from an IEM. The Altone 350 is just a bit too mid-bassy and a tad slow (decay) for complex, fast-paced music. It performs really well for average-tempo music but lingers a bit too much for fast tempos. Fortunately, the quality is good due to the detail, layering, and texture.
Midrange is excellent on the Altone 350 despite being presented a bit behind the low and high frequencies. Surprisingly, it doesn't sound veiled nor muddy. Vocals are presented very well, lush and detailed. The H200 was more upfront for female vocals and guitars which made it sound more edgy in general. Personally, I'd prefer the H200 for guitar driven songs but I'm more happy with the Altone 350 for multi-genre use.
I am quite surprised to hear a smoother treble presentation on the Altone 350. Looking at the frequency graph I initially thought this was going to be more sibilant than the H200 but using the right tips (jvc spiral-dot or comply foam) rewards you with the best treble tuning T-PEOS has ever done. It sits just along the thin line between sibilance and smooth treble. So in most cases, treble quality will highly depend on how the music was originally mixed/mastered. Well mastered recordings sound excellent on the Altone 350. If I were to nit-pick, I'd say the Altone 350's timbre in the treble region is a bit off. The Cymbals do sound thinner and lacks the natural ringing or china timbre. Also I personally think that it also lacks just a bit of air although it's not really bad for most genres.
In short, I would describe the Altone 350 sound as a warmer, smoother, refined H200 tuning... not bad at all. H200 was on the analytical side; the Altone 350 is on the musical side.
The Altone 350 reminds me more of the H200 than H300... the H300 to me had more sub bass rumble, slam and punch, the mids is excellent for female vocals, unfortunately the treble was just too hot. From memory, the H300 is still the best T-PEOS IEM in bass performance: excellent depth due to layering and texture plus control is great for a bass heavy tuning.
The Altone 350's bass quantity reminded me of the H200 but unfortunately quality is not as good IMHO. The H200 bass although not as layered as the H300, was well controlled and had excellent speed - the best performer for heavy metal I've heard from an IEM. The Altone 350 is just a bit too mid-bassy and a tad slow (decay) for complex, fast-paced music. It performs really well for average-tempo music but lingers a bit too much for fast tempos. Fortunately, the quality is good due to the detail, layering, and texture.
Midrange is excellent on the Altone 350 despite being presented a bit behind the low and high frequencies. Surprisingly, it doesn't sound veiled nor muddy. Vocals are presented very well, lush and detailed. The H200 was more upfront for female vocals and guitars which made it sound more edgy in general. Personally, I'd prefer the H200 for guitar driven songs but I'm more happy with the Altone 350 for multi-genre use.
I am quite surprised to hear a smoother treble presentation on the Altone 350. Looking at the frequency graph I initially thought this was going to be more sibilant than the H200 but using the right tips (jvc spiral-dot or comply foam) rewards you with the best treble tuning T-PEOS has ever done. It sits just along the thin line between sibilance and smooth treble. So in most cases, treble quality will highly depend on how the music was originally mixed/mastered. Well mastered recordings sound excellent on the Altone 350. If I were to nit-pick, I'd say the Altone 350's timbre in the treble region is a bit off. The Cymbals do sound thinner and lacks the natural ringing or china timbre. Also I personally think that it also lacks just a bit of air although it's not really bad for most genres.
In short, I would describe the Altone 350 sound as a warmer, smoother, refined H200 tuning... not bad at all. H200 was on the analytical side; the Altone 350 is on the musical side.