Axel
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Oct 17, 2003
- Posts
- 479
- Likes
- 636
Just visited a local shop that carries T+A Solitaire P and P-SE with their dedicated HA200 dac+amp.
I brought my LCD-4z and conducted a listening session.
I listen mostly to classical music, so that was my focus in this audition.
First I compared the P to the P-SE. Comfort-wise, both were good, the P-SE is lighter and therefore a bit more comfortable, but not by a margin. I believe they are both built for long listening sessions without (comfort) fatigue.
Sound-wise, the P was marginally better than the P-SE, this was obvious from the first track. The P had better detail, ambiance, soundstage, dynamics - everything sounded a clear step or two above the P-SE.
Later I connected the LCD-4z to the HA200 (it has multiple inputs, so it was easy to do an A-B-A comparison).
The LCD-4z has a completely different presentation than the P (or P-SE), it was more hard-hitting, but less refined and detail was lost on complex orchestral sections. Detail and separation was much better on the P and soundstage was much larger.
I did not feel any lack of mid-bass (impact) or bass from the P as I had felt with other planars I've previously compared to the LCD-4z.
The P was more homogenic and balanced.
Overall, I came out of this session really liking the P and right now it is a major contender for my next headphones.
I really want to compare it to the Susvara, but I won't be able to, as there's no dealer that carries a Susvara on display.
I brought my LCD-4z and conducted a listening session.
I listen mostly to classical music, so that was my focus in this audition.
First I compared the P to the P-SE. Comfort-wise, both were good, the P-SE is lighter and therefore a bit more comfortable, but not by a margin. I believe they are both built for long listening sessions without (comfort) fatigue.
Sound-wise, the P was marginally better than the P-SE, this was obvious from the first track. The P had better detail, ambiance, soundstage, dynamics - everything sounded a clear step or two above the P-SE.
Later I connected the LCD-4z to the HA200 (it has multiple inputs, so it was easy to do an A-B-A comparison).
The LCD-4z has a completely different presentation than the P (or P-SE), it was more hard-hitting, but less refined and detail was lost on complex orchestral sections. Detail and separation was much better on the P and soundstage was much larger.
I did not feel any lack of mid-bass (impact) or bass from the P as I had felt with other planars I've previously compared to the LCD-4z.
The P was more homogenic and balanced.
Overall, I came out of this session really liking the P and right now it is a major contender for my next headphones.
I really want to compare it to the Susvara, but I won't be able to, as there's no dealer that carries a Susvara on display.