APP is underrated product among audiophiles. Priced right and very nice travel companion.
I love ZMF Atrium btw with EC ZDS.
I love ZMF Atrium btw with EC ZDS.
cause they like to spend time on playing with their toys like LV, guccim, chanel, hemesAlso, why aren't there more women into headphones? I don't get it. Do they not appreciate high quality sound like men? I really can't understand it.
No schiit aims to be the topmost level gear that’s attainable and they are designed and build to a budget . So not summitfiSo Summit fi means expensive gear? Anyone here interested in this here palladium coated plastic bag? Works great to cover your headphones in the showers. Only for the low low summit fi price of 9,999.99.
OK I understand now. Which is saying my palladium is “unattainable” (totally haven’t made it yet), designed and built without any budget limit (cutting up people’s catalytic convert for palladium cost money and hard work ya know), and therefore must be summitfi For headphones!No schiit aims to be the topmost level gear that’s attainable and they are designed and build to a budget . So not summitfi
I do find some differences in different cables for my Shure IEM and my Moondrop para. Mainly the harsh highs and sibilance are markedly reduced with better cables.sometimes I find cable rolling makes more difference than amp rolling
I do find some differences in different cables for my Shure IEM and my Moondrop para. Mainly the harsh highs and sibilance are markedly reduced with better cables.
I know the feeling. I did the same for watches up to last year, funny you talk about Patek. I use the Apple Watch 9 series now because it’s so useful despite my kilobucks watch sitting in their boxes. I think we go through these growth phases. My audio spending right now is still Less than my watches, so I’m still good…I think.My controversial opinion is that a lot of people in the summit-fi realm have no real ear for the hobby and are just addicted to the materialistic thrill of exploring new items. In other consumeristic spaces (watches, fashion, sports cars) - there is a more exposed acceptance of collectability since the object's purpose is knowingly not the point of purchase. For example, you're not buying a Patek Philippe because you need to tell the time - but you will buy it to have something nice to show off - this is an accepted truth. Even more so, many owners don't actually know why the watch is so expensive or what goes into the craftsmanship of it - they blindly know that they want it because the branding and pride of ownership. In our hi-fi land, this is a strongly contested idea. People with 5+ TOTL will still deny the idea that they are simply hoarding. Perhaps that's why we are akin to this hobby and maybe less so to the others. For us to let go of our money, we need to ensure ourselves there is a functional value, even if in reality there isn't. Yes, my $15,000 headphone system sounds noticeably better than my wife's Apple Airpods Max - but why is it that I need that level of fidelity to enjoy music?
When I first got into the hobby I remember buying a grado hp-1000 because 20 years ago that was considered to be one of the GOATs. I remember listening to it and barely understanding why it was any good. I thought something was wrong with it so I bought a hd600 and had the same response. I liked the idea of a nice headphone, but I didn't have an ear for it yet. It took me some time to notice qualities that were important to me. I think some companies, modern stax is a good example, have decided that the most important thing is the "first impression" response that is produced when demoing the unit. For me that's why there is such a disappointment with the x9000, and to some extent the sr-009s.
This is not the main part of what I’m getting at.Some people chase the dragon by upgrading / swapping their main chain endlessly to get to the unattainable sonic perfection for a single headphone while others are hoarders like you mentioned.