hello everyone~ here are some frequency responses of X9 and omega swap their earpads tested on bk4128, hope it will be helpful.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
STAX SR-Ω (SR-Omega) '' The Legendary OMEGA ''
- Thread starter protoss
- Start date
Great work - can you make a graph of just omega stock vs x9000 with omega padshello everyone~ here are some frequency responses of X9 and omega swap their earpads tested on bk4128, hope it will be helpful.
Great work - can you make a graph of just omega stock vs x9000 with omega pads
X9 with omega earpads will significantly reduce bass leakage on test fixture,and bring the curve closer to some targets by the way...
Last edited:
SolarCetacean
500+ Head-Fier
Have any clones of the Omega earpads been made? I would think that most original Stax-made Omega pads would be crumbling by now and any that are still in good condition are best paired with the Omegas still out there.
The Stax foam is surprisingly resilient. Most Omegas I have seen for sale have the original ear pads.Have any clones of the Omega earpads been made? I would think that most original Stax-made Omega pads would be crumbling by now and any that are still in good condition are best paired with the Omegas still out there.
My Omega 1's(0344), bought in 1995, still have the original ear pads and are in perfect shape. Admittedly, my use has been intermittent, but keeping them in the box when not in use has spared them any deterioration.
Can anyone opine on the merits of the Blue Hawaii ES?
I am curious to know more about its comparative strengths, such as base response, hum/hiss issues, sibilance, etc.
I have the original SRM T-1's and find them to be super hum/hiss free, but a bit light on the bass and a bit tizzy at the high end.
Nevertheless, a great amp for being 30 years old.
Your thoughts will be much appreciated.
I am curious to know more about its comparative strengths, such as base response, hum/hiss issues, sibilance, etc.
I have the original SRM T-1's and find them to be super hum/hiss free, but a bit light on the bass and a bit tizzy at the high end.
Nevertheless, a great amp for being 30 years old.
Your thoughts will be much appreciated.
Testing of the standard electrostatic load (120pf) requires about 18ma+ to complete a full voltage swing at 20,000hz (max of human hearing). When the voltage swing is not properly achieved you end up with issues at the ends of the frequency spectrum (loose bass and piercing highs).Can anyone opine on the merits of the Blue Hawaii ES?
I am curious to know more about its comparative strengths, such as base response, hum/hiss issues, sibilance, etc.
I have the original SRM T-1's and find them to be super hum/hiss free, but a bit light on the bass and a bit tizzy at the high end.
Nevertheless, a great amp for being 30 years old.
Your thoughts will be much appreciated.
This is not a perfect way to look at things because tube amps and different style of amps (dc vs ac) sound different also but from one perspective of amplification you could compare:
Most Stax amps are only about 6ma I believe at 350v
BHSE is like 16-18ma at 400v (although technically can go to 25ma but has heat issues)
Carbon can be as high as 22ma at 400v or 500v depending on the build
megatron has 27ma but output to headphone varies . T2 is similar but with more powerful 500v psu.
Circlotron (not currently built by anyone) is at lowest 25ma but is capable of 100ma of current delivery (which would give full voltage swing at 50,000hz lol)
Once you factor in the other differences that affect the timber, there are some more clear match ups. The x9000 for instance does best on the all-tube amps since it has a thinner sound signature. The 007 is great off the carbon since it’s a darker headphone and the extra power gives it clarity.
The omega is a wonderful headphone that pretty much will do well on anything. I liked it a lot with the carbon, bhse, and even the low-power Novem amp.
The bhse is a great all around amp that you can not go wrong with and has excellent support/warranty. It’s been the gold standard for 10+ years now.
Last edited:
number1sixerfan
Headphoneus Supremus
Can anyone opine on the merits of the Blue Hawaii ES?
I am curious to know more about its comparative strengths, such as base response, hum/hiss issues, sibilance, etc.
I have the original SRM T-1's and find them to be super hum/hiss free, but a bit light on the bass and a bit tizzy at the high end.
Nevertheless, a great amp for being 30 years old.
Your thoughts will be much appreciated.
The T1s is my backup amp, and a fine one. I generally like it, but like you mention it's a bit softer when it comes to bass, punch and the high end. Still pretty good for the Stax amps I've heard. The BHSE is quite a bit better. I've never had hum/hiss issues with it, and it's easily better than the T1s as far as punch goes, although not my some obscene amount.
Thanks to you both for your excellent analyses.
It sounds like the BHSE is the amp I should invest in.
Is there any risk of overdriving the vintage Omegas with a higher electrostatic load delivered from the newer amps?
It sounds like the BHSE is the amp I should invest in.
Is there any risk of overdriving the vintage Omegas with a higher electrostatic load delivered from the newer amps?
The amps are very much intended for that (I use my megatron with almost exclusively vintage Stax gear).Thanks to you both for your excellent analyses.
It sounds like the BHSE is the amp I should invest in.
Is there any risk of overdriving the vintage Omegas with a higher electrostatic load delivered from the newer amps?
Maybe @justin w. at headamp can chime in for verification
Thanks...I will look into reaching out to @justin w.
padam
Headphoneus Supremus
Based on older posts like this, I went with a Carbon over a BHSE.
Each have their strengths, but with the Omega in particular, a Carbon works very well.
Each have their strengths, but with the Omega in particular, a Carbon works very well.
Thanks, do you have thoughts about what prompts you to prefer the Carbon?
padam
Headphoneus Supremus
Based on other people's observations, the low-end and dynamics of the Carbon might be a bit ahead of a BHSE where midrange liquidity and soundstage may be better.
I went with the Carbon mainly for the cost and simplicity.
For those other options, I probably wouldn't want to be limited to stock tubes. And these days it seems very hard to find good matched EL34 tubes for reasonable prices.
I went with the Carbon mainly for the cost and simplicity.
For those other options, I probably wouldn't want to be limited to stock tubes. And these days it seems very hard to find good matched EL34 tubes for reasonable prices.
Users who are viewing this thread
Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)