Quote:
Originally Posted by Hirsch
The Lambda Pro has deeper bass than any of the current Stax models that I've heard, as well as very nice dynamic range.
|
It cost me about $500 to find out that, for my favorite recordings, an original Lambda Pro/SRM-1 Mk 2 system performed far better than a brand new Signature II system.
The original Lambda Pros has a modestly higher output at frequencies above 1 kHz. This can provide a more airy sound. The response is pretty smooth and not horribly elevated, so the Lambdas are still usually non-fatiguing and tolerant of less than perfectly recorded music. But some people don't like the faint sheen or extra high frequency emphasis.
The latest Lambdas have an even more accentuated high frequency boost, and it starts below 1 kHz. So the frequency balance is different. Some people may find it more of a good thing; others too much. The bass end is still pretty flat, but it may sound less prominent due to the boosted high end. people have reported stronger bass if the Lambdas are tightly sealed to the head. I never tried this when I had the new Lambdas, and I don't see this effect with my old Lambdas. I don't know if it's head shape specific or Lambda model specific or what.
Unfortunately I've never heard the Omega I or II.
I don't find the old Lambdas too bright sounding. Their sound signature works well for the kind of music I listen to most often. The fact that they can handle transients about 3 dB higher than a current production Lambda without clipping was the important factor for me.
As others have said, tastes vary. I think it's unwise to say "headphone X is the best headphone under Y dollars" or "headphone Z should not be used with music genres A, B, C." It's a good way to start a (pointless) argument. It's not a reliable way to help people find what headphone best suits them.