@Joe Bloggs Thanks a lot for your
personal opinion (or
your brand's opinion if you are representing them). It is interesting to know your viewpoint regarding the thread I created.
Having said that, I'am afraid that your (or your brand's) opinion probably cannot represent other manufacturers. I think you can probably at most represent your own brand's opinion. Am I correct?
From my point of view, I couldn't agree with point 1 and 2 you mentioned. However, I am not going to discuss these two points in details here as these were supposed under the topic of the "closed" thread. If there are enough interests to continue the discussion in a
meaningful and
healthy manner
without any bullying or personal attacks, I am more than happy to provide more evidences on the thread (if it is re-opened again).
I think you made an excellent point here: "
a waveform can only be at one position at any given time". I agreed with this 100%.
Let's assume we are using a perfect 10k sine wave digital source,
What would the wavefrom look like at any given time (for example during
one particular cycle of the 10k "sine wave") ?
On that particular cycle, the waveform is "super sharp" instead of "smeared". During that
particular cycle, is the waveform reconstructed a
perfect 10k sine wave?
Where is the "smearing" coming from if
every cycle reconstructed is a
perfect 10k sine wave?
Thanks for your suggestion (that based on your own opinion). I respect your viewpoint. However, my critical thinking does not allow me to agree with yours. I hope you understand.
Cheers
p.s.
@Joe Bloggs I bet you want to see my reply based on what you wrote. As
@XTF1 suggested I should just shut up, I will delete this reply if you are indeed not expecting my reply. Please let me know if I shoud delete it. Thanks.