comzee
500+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Dec 8, 2010
- Posts
- 555
- Likes
- 400
LINK
Thoughts?
EDIT:
I want to add I'm not an "expert" in this area (audio). News sources all over are reporting the "snake oil" concept here. With items like this it's very easy to debunk, so to speak, the benefits it claims to give.
This is for all my fellow skeptics out there, if you're like me head-fi is a minefield of figuring out what's rhetoric and what's not. What's made up to sell products, and what isn't. Remember conman came from confidence man, which many people have here. A slim few offer up scientific test results. Burn me at the stake now I guess.
My current list of things that don't add quality:
1. Anything above 320kbps audio
2. ASIO and similar concepts
3. Any analogue cable that costs over $15*
4. FLAC**
*first time I heard about cryogenic frozen cables here... -_- no words.
**In some cases FLAC sounds better then 320kbps mp3 just because it was created from a different master source that might have been better.
Thoughts?
EDIT:
I want to add I'm not an "expert" in this area (audio). News sources all over are reporting the "snake oil" concept here. With items like this it's very easy to debunk, so to speak, the benefits it claims to give.
This is for all my fellow skeptics out there, if you're like me head-fi is a minefield of figuring out what's rhetoric and what's not. What's made up to sell products, and what isn't. Remember conman came from confidence man, which many people have here. A slim few offer up scientific test results. Burn me at the stake now I guess.
My current list of things that don't add quality:
1. Anything above 320kbps audio
2. ASIO and similar concepts
3. Any analogue cable that costs over $15*
4. FLAC**
*first time I heard about cryogenic frozen cables here... -_- no words.
**In some cases FLAC sounds better then 320kbps mp3 just because it was created from a different master source that might have been better.