Hanesu
1000+ Head-Fier
Sir/Ma'am,
Per the Final Audio Website
"Aging is a phenomenon by which sound changes by continued use over a certain period of time. A driver unit produces sound through the vibration of an extremely thin heat-formed film. The cause is not clear, but it is thought that the film might become accustomed to the stress applied from the forming of the film or stress from the adhesive through continued use over time so that minute signals can be transmitted easily. A long period of time is required before the aging effects on this product become unnoticeable. Generally, through 150 to 200 hours of ordinary use sensitivity increases to achieve the level of sound quality for which the product had been originally designed."
As I mentioned before, I'm new to the hobby. I'm also a little bit confused, because I know some(maybe most) do not believe in "aging". My experience with the Final Audio B3, they do sound warmer and the base is now deeper since I first buough them a little over a month ago, at least to my ears. The other side to that is that I bough the ZX507 and the Final Audio the same day and I don't know if is the "burn" period of the DAP that is making them sound warmer. It could be the combination of both for all I know.
I did test the Andromeda's and to my ears they do not sound as warm as the Final Audio B3. The thing is, if I read the graph right, the Andros are suppose to be warmer...correct? Link >>> https://crinacle.com/graphs/iems/graphtool/ What I do know, the pair the shop has in store, do not have a lot of miles on them. I'm planning on going to e-earphones in Akihabara to try theirs which I know have a lot of miles and maybe find the answer to the question of "aging"....prolly not
As you already know there is a lot of information out there and it can be confusing/contradicting. The worst part IMHO, a lot is subjective and as a photography enthusiast I can tell you there are a lot of Ken Rockwell's out there. To be honest, you sound like one of them.
As a 20 year U.S. Air Force aircraft mechanic (almost retired) I do have a mild case of tinnitus, no hearing loss per the doc. I can tell the difference between an MP3 file and a lossless compressed (FLAC) however, I can not tell the difference between Hi Res and regular CD 16/44 , as far as I can tell Hi Res is a gimmick or just not for my ears.
Thanks in advance.
Hi! Sorry, I did not understand the "Ken Rockwell" part (don`t know him but I googled he is a photographer?), but I can assure you my post was really not meant as an offense! When I said "if you believe in aging you will hear it" I 100% meant it like that because as a matter of fact there is a lot of controversy about this topic in the audio world and people have different opinions about it. Just as you can read in marketing material of some audio companies about it, you will find many postings concerning "burn in" in this forum.... but there is also scientific research that finds absolutely no evidence for its existence. Then there are "psychoacoustics" - which basically say the brain gets used to different sounds after a while....
Well, whatever opinion you develop about this topic - my personal approach is that even if it exists (I am trying to stay neutral here), for sure it cannot change the sound of an earphone in its essential character. So instead of thinking too much about "burn in" and hoping it will change the sound of something positively, I try to find gear that I like from the beginning! "Problem" solved.
Last edited: