NaiveSound
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Nov 8, 2015
- Posts
- 3,178
- Likes
- 619
Does the wm1a turn more reference after the recent update too?
Yes, it does. What's the problem with that? Are you afraid of having to burn your walkman in from the very beginning?
The more I look at this golden nugget, the more I like it
I really dont like the idea of changing the sound signature at each firmware update. I had the chance of comparing 1a to lotoo paw gold (lpg) and did not like the sound signature of 1a. I thought it was very digital without any positive points over lpg. However, I also recently had a chance of listening to 1z and making the same comparison with lpg. I used z1r and warbler prelude for that and loved the tuning and the sound signature and enjoyed the synergy with those head/earphones. I enjoyed that listening session so much that I ordered 1z right at that spot and instance. I am still waiting for the delivery, but the idea of the sound signature that I fell in love with, might not be available with my future 1z makes me anxious. Although not probable, I believe that I will be very angry and frustrated if my 1z will come with the firmware 2.0.
I've only listened to this one piece in MQA - well, I'm still listening, and I'm not sure which of the two formats I prefer. Clearly, a lot depends on the skill of the engineers and the venue acoustics. I do however think it is a very close run thing, all other things being equal. However, in 12 years of listening to these ety's, I have never encountered such presence - and low end presence at that.
DSD can sometimes sound clinical, but I don't think that's a characteristic of DSDs as such. I think I would have to hear a lot more MQA to reach a conclusion. Unfortunately, the catalogue for MQA in classical is somewhat limited ATM, but I don' think MQA can be dismissed as a gimmick. I definitely want more! If I understand how MQA works, what you hear is defined by how good your gear is (ie, how much the music can be "unfolded"). This is an interesting technology for sure.
I've only listened to this one piece in MQA - well, I'm still listening, and I'm not sure which of the two formats I prefer. Clearly, a lot depends on the skill of the engineers and the venue acoustics. I do however think it is a very close run thing, all other things being equal. However, in 12 years of listening to these ety's, I have never encountered such presence - and low end presence at that.
DSD can sometimes sound clinical, but I don't think that's a characteristic of DSDs as such. I think I would have to hear a lot more MQA to reach a conclusion. Unfortunately, the catalogue for MQA in classical is somewhat limited ATM, but I don' think MQA can be dismissed as a gimmick. I definitely want more! If I understand how MQA works, what you hear is defined by how good your gear is (ie, how much the music can be "unfolded"). This is an interesting technology for sure.
Don't worry, it likely won't. And you can downgrade anyway
I had a chance to test all available firmware versions with my WM1Z. The original v1.02 is still the best sounding to my ears. It has the widest soundstage and a "tuby" sound signature. It's the most musical firmware. With each new firmware iteration, the sound signature becomes more "referency" and less fun.
http://walkman.update.sony.net/fw/pc/WM1/NW-WM1_V1_02.exe
1. I don’t know if it would work with 1A.1 - can i use this FW with the 1a ? is it again a dual 1a/1z FW ?
2 - how do you use/revert to older FWs ? is it the same procedure as using the new FW ?
thank you
Yes its possible but i haven't found many that i could buy without breaking the bank.It's possible to have an adapter 4.4mm (female) to another (2.5-3.5-6.335 or XLR) termination male ?