ithehappy
100+ Head-Fier
Meaning?
LOL! Meaning I am angry, because that's a great price for it!
Congratulations by the way.
Meaning?
Has anyone used the DT770 before this, or after, or have both? Any comments?
Man, you guys really did push me to take a leap of faith here.
Was looking at the MDR-1A to have a bit of a plushy-er headphone to travel with, replacing my original M50....then i stumbled upon the great 100aap vs 1a debate.
I ended up going to the 100aap. The cans will arrive on tuesday, and let's see how it'll be.
I'll blame you guys if it doesn't float my boat heheh :evil:
DT770 in any variation is far above the level of MDR-1A or 100. Far better resolution, detail, extension, bigger soundstage, better imaging, etc. Simply not comparable because DT770 is a 300 dollar level headphone and worth it completely, Sony's are pushing it at 150 for what you get in terms of sound.
I had an extended listen at 3 different Sony shops near me.
I narrowed it down to the MDR-100AAP and the Denon AH-MM400.
I just happened to pass by and see the MDR-1A, $300, and it was just a display sample. So I tried it, expecting dark, muddy Sony. Well, no, it was actually very good.
And the comfort, which has rocketed up to right near the top of the list, above build quality and price, right next to sound quality, was the best ever.
Too many cans have been unwearable after an hour . Not these. So I was like, dang, might I actually consider these? Just maybe.
Then I went to go look for the Denon. That was the main purpose of the trip. On the way, I happened to see this thread. I was like, oh, well these 100AAP are all over the place. So I had a listen, and my first listen I was floored. These were clearly, obviously better than the MDR-1A, and I never picked up the MDR-1A again.
I listened to the Denon, and it was just different, but *probably* more mature, more neutral, more detailed. But they are also more than twice the price.
The Momentum 2.0 is very expensive here, and also double price. So I had a listen anyway. Not bad but not better than the 100AAP.
Then the Bang & Olufsen H6, wow that's comfortable but just anemic.
I then went back and forth between the Denon MM400 and the 100AAP.
I then took a listen to the P5 series 2. Sorry, no go. Not good.
Then the Momentum 2.0 again, and once again it didn't sound as good as the 100AAP.
So it's now the MM400 and 100AAP.
The 100AAP:
--wonderful space between the notes
--brighter sounding, seemed to have thinner mids, but very nice sparkle
--deep wide spacious soundstage
--very energetic and quick and deep, ample bass.
--super comfortable and light, I can't imagine anyone who would find comfort an issue
--unashamedly plastic, but I consider this a plus b/c you don't need to worry about putting these in a backpack. They are made to be used out and about.
--super good for rock and pop
Denon MM400:
--everything a little more coherent
--not as fun, more clinical, more detailed
--bass is there, but probably as the sound engineer recorded it. No boosting at all.
--plays everything well
--more mature and probably what audiophiles would like, kind of would grade out better on a technical analysis
--comfort is very excellent as well, I have no issues with it.
--these reminded me of the NAD Viso H50, but with way better fit
The 100AAP because of its low price just simply can't be ignored. It is the best bang for buck headphone I have ever heard.
My single worry is if the highs are a little too piercing or could be tamed a little. But these are very, very minor and had I not ever heard the Denon, I wouldn't even be thinking twice.
Score:
100AAP: 97%
Denon MM400: 99%