Quote:
Well I guess that's true, but that does not mean the study is wrong or that they don't have even more interest in creating something meaningful. After all, the more robust the methodology is, the less one can dismiss it as marketing.
I've spoken to Roy and Steve and I sense a real good faith effort to create a tangible, scientific metric and testing methodology.
One thing that was clear from the PPT presentation, they really went into a very detailed methodology that was designed by real scientists and engineers.
Originally Posted by colonelkernel8 /img/forum/go_quote.gif No, they have significant interest in making money. |
Well I guess that's true, but that does not mean the study is wrong or that they don't have even more interest in creating something meaningful. After all, the more robust the methodology is, the less one can dismiss it as marketing.
I've spoken to Roy and Steve and I sense a real good faith effort to create a tangible, scientific metric and testing methodology.
One thing that was clear from the PPT presentation, they really went into a very detailed methodology that was designed by real scientists and engineers.