Change is Good
Headphoneus Supremus
Thanks gelocks. Would you think they could be heard in the next room with my door closed?
Are you serious?!? Lol
Thanks gelocks. Would you think they could be heard in the next room with my door closed?
Are you serious?!? Lol![]()
If you listen at pretty loud volumes and the whole place is dead silent... yep. If there's like TV's on in the other rooms, etc. I'm pretty sure they wouldn't notice. But these are definitely not your closed-back headphones you listen to with your partner by your side...![]()
Bass quantity: Signature DJs --> SRH1540 --> Alpha Dogs --> Beyer T5p
Bass quality: Alpha Dogs == Signature DJs --> Beyer T5p --> SRH1540
Mids presentation: Beyer T5p --> Alpha Dogs --> SRH1540 --> Signature DJs
Soundstage/imaging: Beyer T5p --> Alpha Dogs == SRH1540 --> Signature DJs
Highs: Alpha Dogs --> Signature DJs --> SRH1540 --> Beyer T5p
Sound Isolation/Leakage: Alpha Dogs --> Signature DJs == Beyer T5p --> SRH1540
Fun Factor: Signature DJs --> SRH1540 --> Alpha Dogs --> Beyer T5p
Price: Alpha Dogs == SRH1540 --> Signature DJs --> Beyer T5p
Now, my question for gelocks is how different is the mid and sound stage of the Sig DJ compared with the SRH1540? I would think any mid range further back than the SRH1540 would sound recessed to me.Is the Sig DJ recessed (further back) in the mid range compared with the SRH1540?
Same principle applies to the sound stage. I find the SRH1540 open sounding and very good compared with the T5p. The T5p may sound a little more open but there really is little in it to be honest. Is the sound stage of the Sig DJ closed sounding compared with the SRH1540? How different are they?
While I consider the T5p technically a better headphone, a notch up in sound quality, it's the comfort, price, bass, fun factor of the the SRH1540 that would get my nod. Now, what to do about the Signature DJ............?
First, even though the Sig DJs are not that heavy, their earpads although good coupled with the clamp makes them NOT as comfortable as the headphones listed before. Not that bad, but definitely not as good as the SRH1540s.
Regarding mids, the SRH1540s are very smooth and even across with that tinge of warmness due to their increased bass. The Sig DJs are not as smooth and they indeed sound more recessed (again, big bass) if you compare them directly. Sound stage on the SIg DJs seemed wider to me but the imaging of the Shures I liked a lot more (i.e. instrument separation/clarity). Shure's can sound a bit more "open" due to that good imaging but the Sig DJs can sound a bit airier due to their differences in the high region.
I find the Sig DJs "funner" than the SRHs, and the Alpha's more "analytical" and laid-back which is why my Shure's had to go!
Good luck,
The logical successor of the HFI-780 is the Signature PRO, not the DJ. You might want to check the graphs on Inner Fidelity.
The logical successor of the HFI-780 is the Signature PRO, not the DJ. You might want to check the graphs on Inner Fidelity.
As far as I understand from the graphs, the 780 has more sub bass and the Sig Pro has more mid bass? I actually thought the Ed.8 had a similar graph to the 780 though.
I think I really want to try the SRH1540 but I am freaked out by the bass bump on the frequency graph at Headroom.
I think I really want to try the SRH1540 but I am freaked out by the bass bump on the frequency graph at Headroom.
Yea I've heard much better reviews on the Signature Pro than the DJ. I believe the graphs, as Pietcux mentioned, are better on the Pro.