?
I read your earlier posts and wondered where you were going with this - and I'll have to disagree here.
I agree that well recorded/encoded 128kbps actually doesn't sound too bad - but if you were going to tell the difference (artifacting especially) between lossy formats - then you're more likely to differentiate 128 from 320 vs 320 from lossless. In fact most of the time, most people will have a very difficult time to differentiate 320kbps from lossless - no matter what their gear (under properly controlled blind testing conditions).
Oh - and 24/192 won't make a blind bit of difference in the comparison either. Try it sometime. I suggest using Nero-aac 256kbps actually. Take any 24/192 track, resample and re-encode it to aac256. Conduct a double blind abx using Foobar. Results could surprise
As far as the 535 not being resolving enough ...... well I've never had issues with the detail from those IEMs. Maybe my ears are shot
.
@Techmonstr
If 128kbps is all you have, and what you are used to - and you are comparing all the IEMs using the same tracks - then they'll be OK. Always better to compare with your own music that you know well.