Totally
Agreed the mastering is paramount. I have laid off Hi-Res for last few years as I found the provenance of much Hi-Res to be questionable. That said some of the better masters I have are in Hi-Res formats.
Also agree that the quality of the components are more important than the technical spec/ability to play infinite high resolution.
So far I'm finding what others have said earlier in the thread in that I'd like a bit more bass not masses but a touch. If we are not caring about the resolution then I find some of these Hi-Res players too focussed on a sound signature that is revealing rather than engaging.
Hi res files have been supported for a good while now. The mastering of the source file is more important than hi res in my opinion.
But like I said all modern dacs support hi res formats and files. Lots of people say they can’t hear a difference, so that’s up to the individual. What I’m saying is your not paying a premium for the hi res certification, a good amplification implementation is more important as is the low pass filter.
And the M0 is pretty damn cheap for the build, sound and features in a tiny package.
Agreed the mastering is paramount. I have laid off Hi-Res for last few years as I found the provenance of much Hi-Res to be questionable. That said some of the better masters I have are in Hi-Res formats.
Also agree that the quality of the components are more important than the technical spec/ability to play infinite high resolution.
So far I'm finding what others have said earlier in the thread in that I'd like a bit more bass not masses but a touch. If we are not caring about the resolution then I find some of these Hi-Res players too focussed on a sound signature that is revealing rather than engaging.