starfly
1000+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Aug 14, 2013
- Posts
- 1,424
- Likes
- 538
Cute work, however, I don't think headphones make good microphones and visa versa. Part of doing lab work is having accurate measurement systems that you can rely upon.
+1
Cute work, however, I don't think headphones make good microphones and visa versa. Part of doing lab work is having accurate measurement systems that you can rely upon.
Please explain how one would scientifically produce a frequency/frequency graph, and it's practical use against a frequency/volume graph.
I've never heard of the existence of such a thing.
I'm pretty sure there is lots of other things you didn't hear of, so why you are surprised?
Cute work, however, I don't think headphones make good microphones and visa versa. Part of doing lab work is having accurate measurement systems that you can rely upon.
Cute work, however, I don't think headphones make good microphones and visa versa. Part of doing lab work is having accurate measurement systems that you can rely upon.
Ignorance is not a sin - so why I ask, are you being rude/patronising?
I asked a simple question but it seems you can't even answer it.
All you've done since is provide frequency/volume graphs... I still don't see these legendary frequency/frequency graphs anywhere.
You're off course right, but on the other hand if you look at results you'd notice they are quite consistent regardless of which headphone I use as mic. I think the baseline is that I was wrong in saying that Momentum can't go below 80Hz. It is also true that Momentum can play 10Hz sine wave, nevertheless below 40Hz sound becomes more and more distorted, and at 10Hz all your ears hear is 2nd and 3rd harmonic. But this is the same for the two other headphones (RHA30 and HD215), and it probably is true for most headphones at least below certain price level.
The graphs show you frequency response for single frequency. The frequency/frequency would be a spectrogram like one in foobar2k., but without good microphone I don't think I can provide one that would mean anything. I made more measurements than what I present here, and I found that 40Hz is quite undistorted, while with 35Hz (on graphs) harmonics become more significant. I was hoping to find that Momentum has more harmonic distortion than RHA30, but I failed, since it doesn't - at least not in my measurements.
Momentum do have nice sub bass, but I think it really depends on your source.
It's not exactly scientific, but using this tool:
http://www.audionotch.com/app/tune/
I can clearly hear a tone down to 20hz without any significant audible artifacts (and no harmonics to be found - as a musician I find these easy to detect - I can even whistle a harmonic)- below that it's just feeling/hearing 'movement'.![]()
All this tool proves really is that the Momentum, most importantly, can play these notes. I'm not a dubstep-basshead, so the actual quality of the very lowest sub-bass bares no significance to me.
I doubt you'll be able to find many headphones at all that perform just as well in the absolute sub-bass region as they do in the midrange or treble, especially a closed-back headphone.
The graphs show you frequency response for single frequency. The frequency/frequency would be a spectrogram like one in foobar2k., but without good microphone I don't think I can provide one that would mean anything. I made more measurements than what I present here, and I found that 40Hz is quite undistorted, while with 35Hz (on graphs) harmonics become more significant. I was hoping to find that Momentum has more harmonic distortion than RHA30, but I failed, since it doesn't - at least not in my measurements.
I'm pretty sure a spectrogram is frequency against time, not frequency against frequency.
Perhaps what you're talking about are waterfall charts - but they show frequency/amplitude/time.
I still have no idea what a frequency/frequency graph is.
I'm pretty sure a spectrogram is frequency against time, not frequency against frequency.
Perhaps what you're talking about are waterfall charts - but they show frequency/amplitude/time.
I still have no idea what a frequency/frequency graph is.
And if frequency changes monotonically in time then guess what you get...
Really I regret I said anything...
Well you havn't yet actually said anything.
I still don't see these fabled frequency/frequency graphs. Either produce them or stop blowing smoke.
A given frequency by definition cannot change monotonically.
"Monotonic change" is an oxymoron.