So is the grainy-treble that Tyll remarks upon in his review have anything to do with group-delay?
When you look at his charts, it seems he only shows one ear, but on rtings charts, where you see both ears, you see the initial impulse going in opposite directions. While this is below the level of hearing, it makes me wonder if this is *indicative* of something else going on that may be part of the grain.
Here is a graph of both. Note the 660s has the larger response. Play - look at most other models - the group delay tracks for the most part - but not in the 240's, or the 660s!
https://www.rtings.com/headphones/1-4/graph#816/4014/387
So, what's another headphone that has a "grain" to it? The venerable AKG K240. And possibly now the K812. If you look on the rtings charts showing group delay for *both* ears, you see a similar pattern on the leading edge of the impulse. Other headphones don't seem to have this initial opposition in group delay - at least as I see it on the rtings charts.
So - at least on the K240, I believe - but cannot prove - is that this is done on purpose to soften the leading edge of metallic strikes, like removing the "strike" of instruments like cymbals, triangles, cowbells, and such, yet still allowing the instrument to ring. Or at the worst, if editing movie scenes with gunshots in them, preserving your hearing.
If anyone is hearing that on the 660s (missing percussion stick strikes, yet the cymbals still ring), then that is precisely why I am asking - it would seem that the 660s would make a FINE set of STUDIO cans that protects the worker's hearing, albeit at the cost of some grain, and slight loss of absolute audiophile fidelity.
Am I on to something, or am I totally full of it?